Saturday, June 2, 2007

Editorial: Regarding Opposition to SB 30
Erik Kancler, LandWatch

I have been very careful in editing this blog to ensure that the content is devoted almost entirely to supporters of SB 30 and not filled with "editorial content." However, I believe that the following is matter worth commenting on as it forces the fundamental question of who exactly is in support of SB 30 and who is against it.

A few days ago, the Bend Bulletin published an "In My View" by a Bend resident named Duane Clark.

In his letter, Mr. Clark informed his readers that he is a former watermaster with extensive experience in the Metolius basin, thus attempting to establish himself as an authority on water in the Metolius, which he may well be. What he didn't inform his readers of - or the Bulletin, it seems - is the fact that he is a close friend of the Colson family and that he was worked for them as a paid consultant on water-related issues before.

The Source Weekly has just reported on this matter, you can find the story here.

The point of the piece isn't to discredit Clark, per se, but to raise legitimate questions about his partiality on the matter and ask the readers to decide for themselves where they think he stands.

When I first read the piece, I thought to myself, "Well, here's the first real opinion piece I can recall where an impartial observer - a regular and probably well-informed citizen - has come out against SB 30."

As it turns out, that may not be the case. The letter got me wondering just how strong the support for SB 30 is amongst people, and left me thinking that if this is all the other side can muster up, they must really be struggling. Even Senator Ted Ferrioli - in his floor speech on SB 30 - couldn't claim to have talked to any consituents in his district who were against SB 30 and who were not local government officials or who otherwise stood to gain in some way from the developments going forward.

As has been reported previously, Sen. Westlund's office has received more letters of support for SB 30 than they have in support or opposition of any other bill. This was true as far back as a month ago, and he's certainly received many more letters since. When last I checked, those letters of support outnumbered those opposing SB 30 by 100-1.

On this blog alone, we have received over 260 letters of total support for SB 30 and a ban on resorts in or near the Metolius basin. Those letters have come from Republicans and Democrats from districts all over the state.

And numerous public interest groups have lined up to support SB 30 as well. Not Just Friends of the Metolius and LandWatch, but Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, Trout Unlimited, The Native Fish Society, WaterWatch of Oregon, OSPIRG, the Oregon League of Conservation Voters, 1000 Friends of Oregon, and numerous others. Not a single group has staked out opposition to SB 30.

Where this leaves us is that support for SB 30 among unbiased citizens - those who don't stand to gain politically or financially from the bill - seems to be near unanimous. And contrary to what the Bulletin has suggested repeatedly on its editorial page, this support extends far beyond Camp Sherman, both geographically and in number of supporters. The only real detractors of SB 30, it seems, are the owners/developers of the Dutch Pacific and Colson properties and their associates, local officials in Madras (but not in Sisters or Warm Springs!) and Republicans in the state legislature.

It's understandable why the developers are against SB 30 and why Jefferson County is opposed given the position they've staked out for themsleves, but given how the general public feels, why haven't any of the Republicans in the legislature come around? They all voted against it in the Senate, and I'm not aware of any in the House who have expressed any intent to support SB 30 when it comes time to do so. So what's holding them up?

At this point it's hard to say, but it certainly isn't their consituents.

-Erik Kancler
Executive Director, Central Oregon LandWatch
Bend, OR

Friday, June 1, 2007

Do Not Let the Metolius Get Destroyed - Michael Graham, Portland

[Sent to the members of the House Rules Committee and copied to House leadership:]

This message is to implore you, as a member of the House Elections, Ethics and Rules Committee to vote to pass, UNCHANGED, Senate Bill 30, a measure passed by the Senate and now in the House. This bill protects the precious Metolius Basin from rapacious development by landowners who have cowed Jefferson County into submission and whose only real interest is in creating profits for themselves and their cronies.

For the last 30 years we have seen the Metolius Basin community slowly grow and the growth has been well managed and it's effects on the basin have been minimal.

The proposed development of no less than 3000 homes on on the 3500 acres of the Colson property and over 300 units on the 640 acres on the Dutch/Pacific property are simply outrageous. The destruction of wildlife habitat, the creation of colossal traffic overloading of the roads, the degradation of water quality and availability, and the additional pollution created by so many new residences in the now pristine area are mind-boggling. This unique basin would be overwhelmed and it's pristine character, a precious possession of ALL THE STATE AND, INDEED, THE ENTIRE COUNTRY, would be forever lost. All for a pitiful modest inflow of tax dollars to the county.

I encourage you to vote for the original uncompromised version of Senate Bill 30 and place a total prohibition of any destination resorts in or within three miles of the Metolius Basin watershed.The Metolius basin is a unique and precious asset to the state and the country...we cannot let it be destroyed by greedy, unthinking and uncaring so-called "developers".

Michael H. Graham, MD
Portland

Protect The Metolius Basin From Rapacious Development - Michael Graham, Portland

Dear Representative Rosenbaum,

This message is to implore you, as Chair of the House Elections, Ethics and Rules Committee to vote to pass, UNCHANGED, Senate Bill 30, a measure passed by the Senate and now in the House. This bill protects the precious Metolius Basin from rapacious development by landowners who have cowed Jefferson County into submission and whose only real interest is in creating profits for themselves and their cronies.

For the last 30 years we have seen the Metolius Basin community slowly grow and the growth has been well managed and it's effects on the basin have been minimal.

The proposed development of no less than 3000 homes on on the 3500 acres of the Colson property and over 300 units on the 640 acres on the Dutch/Pacific property are simply outrageous. The destruction of wildlife habitat, the creation of colossal traffic overloading of the roads, the degradation of water quality and availability, and the additional pollution created by so many new residences in the now pristine area are mind-boggling. This unique basin would be overwhelmed and it's pristine character, a precious possession of ALL THE STATE AND, INDEED, THE ENTIRE COUNTRY, would be forever lost. All for a pitiful modest inflow of tax dollars to the county.

I encourage you to vote for the original uncompromised version of Senate Bill 30 and place a total prohibition of any destination resorts in or within three miles of the Metolius Basin watershed.The Metolius basin is a unique and precious asset to the state and the country...we cannot let it be destroyed by greedy, unthinking and uncaring so-called "developers".

Michael H. Graham, MD
Portland

Imploring You To Pass Senate Bill 30 - Michael Graham, Portland

Dear Representative Greenlick,

This message is to implore you to vote to pass, UNCHANGED, Senate Bill 30, a measure passed by the Senate and now in the House. This bill protects the precious Metolius Basin from rapacious development by landowners who have cowed Jefferson County into submission and whose only real interest is in creating profits for themselves and their cronies.

For the last 30 years we have seen the Metolius Basin community slowly grow and the growth has been well managed and it's effects on the basin have been minimal.

The proposed development of no less than 3000 homes on on the 3500 acres of the Colson property and over 300 units on the 640 acres on the Dutch/Pacific property are simply outrageous. The destruction of wildlife habitat, the creation of colossal traffic overloading of the roads, the degradation of water quality and availability, and the additional pollution created by so many new residences in the now pristine area are mind-boggling. This unique basin would be overwhelmed and it's pristine character, a precious possession of ALL THE STATE AND, INDEED, THE ENTIRE COUNTRY, would be forever lost. All for a pitiful modest inflow of tax dollars to the county.

I encourage you, as my representative, to vote for the original uncompromised version of Senate Bill 30 and place a total prohibition of any destination resorts in or within three miles of the Metolius Basin watershed.The Metolius basin is a unique and precious asset to the state and the country...we cannot let it be destroyed by greedy, unthinking and uncaring so-called "developers".

Michael H. Graham, MD
Portland

Don't Make Same Mistakes Here - Dennis Smith, Enterprise

Dear Representative Smith,

I am urging you to support, in the House, the passage of Oregon Senate Bill 30. Please do not allow weakening of this bill in the House by those who support development. I have lived in Oregon for 44 years and have seen many land use changes. I am an Oregon Growth Boundary advocate. I have also spent many days over many years along and on the Metolius River and vicinity. In view of the shrinking open spaces we are experiencing with statewide development, it would be an extremely bad decision to allow development of resorts along this watershed. The charm of the area is in it's wild character as well as it's unique setting, spring-fed water, diverse plant life and crystal-clear water. It is understandable that it would (and does) draw crowds to its banks and that there is profit to be made by accommodations and amenities. By doing so would, ironically, destroy that very character as we have seen in so many similar circumstances around the state. Let us not make these same mistakes yet again and instead take measures to protect our state treasures.

Thank you for your consideration,

Dennis Smith
Enterprise, OR

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Staunch Republicans Support SB 30 - Bill Failing, Portland

Senator Ferroli,

For you to have voted against the Metolius River development threat—a no-brainer for those of us who value this State’s uniqueness, suggests your lack of really respecting or understanding Oregon’s most fundamental asset---its natural beauty. My family have been staunch Republicans for decades…but they valued and fought against those who would compromise an area that is sacred to real Oregonians…Yes, you are working hard for those who want Oregon to be like every other mall-infested, greed--first, dark corner of this country that caters to the lowest common denominator. 2500 homes and two golf courses on Green Ridge? You are not alone in your pandering to quid-pro-quo developers, but where is your courage to do what is right?

Why would you send us an e-mail?

Bill Failing
Portland, OR

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

We Need Leaders With Courage and Foresight - Tom Anderson

Dear Representative Nelson:

I think the last time I saw you in McMinnville was at Rite Aid. I hope to see you around town again soon.

I am writing to you about a piece of legislation that is very important to me. My fondest childhood memories are from my family’s summer trips to Camp Sherman. I think you know my parents, Herb and Barbara Anderson. Every summer, they took us to the Metolius River where we camped or rented a cabin. It was there that I first developed my love of Nature. I have been returning ever since to camp, hike, and fish, and ride my bike. It is close enough that I can even go for the day from McMinnville.

The thing about the Metolius and Camp Sherman that makes them so special is that the area is an incredibly beautiful natural wonderland where there is a perfect balance between accessibility and a quiet experience in a part of nature that if you’ve ever been there I think you would agree is paradise. I was shocked to learn that Jefferson County has decided to permit the development of destination resorts in the Metolius Basin with thousands and thousands of houses, golf courses, etc. I am not against development, but the Metolius River Basin is one of the greatest natural treasures in this state; it is the wrong place to build destination resorts because that would forever ruin the special character of this unique place, with overcrowding, traffic, noise, and pollution. Have you ever stood on the wooden bridge at Camp Sherman and fed the huge trout swimming below it? That bridge could not accommodate the 9,000 additional daily car trips the proposed destination resort would bring. The sleepy little village of Camp Sherman would be changed forever into something more like downtown Sisters—hard to even cross the road. I cringe to think of what the crowds would do to the banks of the river.

Senate Bill 30 prohibits the development of destination resorts within three miles of the Metolius River Watershed. It passed the senate without a single Republican vote. That’s why I am writing to you, my Republican representative. I don’t know how hard it would be for you to break ranks if that’s what it would take for you to vote for SB30, but if anyone has the strength of character to do so, I think and hope that it is you. Republicans can go down in history as some of the most well-regarded preservationists the world has ever known. Republican President Theodore Roosevelt is loved and remembered for permanently preserving some of the most unique natural resources of the United States, creating 150 National Forests, 51 Federal Bird Reservations, 4 National Game Preserves, 5 National Parks, and 18 National Monuments—a total of 230,000,000 acres.

Perhaps no one has done more to improve and preserve “livability” in Oregon than Republican governor Tom McCall. With the bottle bill, and preserving public access to our beaches, he brought national recognition to Oregon that in the decades since has paid off not only in making this one of the best places in the country to live, but it also has brought high quality economic development to our state. And two-term Republican Governor Mark Hatfield opened a statewide dialogue about livability when he spoke out against thoughtless speculators and developers who were befouling Oregon's landscape. When the Lincoln County Chamber of Commerce began touting the ticky-tacky stretch of U.S. Highway 101 through the county as the “Twenty Miracle Miles,” Governor Hatfield remarked that “Twenty Miserable Miles” would be a more fitting description.

We no longer have the courage and foresight of Republicans Theodore Roosevelt, Tom McCall, or Mark Hatfield, but we have you. With all due respect, if you vote with other Republicans to allow development of destination resorts in the Metolius River Basin some developers will be happy with you, but your constituents and the citizens of Oregon will not. Your vote and your mark on Oregon’s future will be remembered only by those whom it disappoints. If, on the other hand, you show the courage and leadership of a Tom McCall or Mark Hatfield, you will make a mark in the history of this state that will be revered. I’m not sure how the politics works within the party, but if you support SB 30, I predict that you will be most favorably featured in newspapers across the state. Obviously, you can’t do this if it is not something you believe in, but if you have ever been to the Metolius River, I am confident that you will find it in your heart to take a stand to preserve it as it is for generations of future Oregonians.

Thank you for your work on behalf of your constituents and the people of Oregon and thank you for reading my rather long email.

Sincerely,
Tom Anderson

Law Offices of Thomas H. Anderson, P.C.
McMinnville, Oregon

Basin Will Not Benefit From More Development - David Mittelstadt & Family, Beaverton

Hello Good Representatives of Oregon –

I’m writing to ask that you please help protect the Metolius Basin.

My family and I have enjoyed our time on the Metolius for years. I really feel with all the campsites, current residents, the proximity to Black Butte, Sisters, Bend, Redmond & Madras that the Basin today is at maximum capacity for a natural area. As someone who enjoys spending time regularly on the Metolius I can attest that this spot is shared by MANY today. This is not an isolated area that deserves more development for the benefit of all. The majority of Oregonians are best served by keeping the impact on this area low and accessing the basin by all the current opportunities.

I urge you to please consider protecting this natural area from additional development for our and future generations.

Thank You,
David Mittelstadt & Family
Beaverton, OR

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Metolius Inspires - Rob Gagnier, Beaverton

Dear Representatives [all],

I am a proud native Oregonian and have seen both the positive and negative impacts of the significant growth in our state. Sadly I have to admit that this is the first time I have ever sent a letter or email to my state representatives. However, I recently spent the Memorial weekend with some friends along the Metolius river and have seen first hand the beauty of this natural area. This visit has prompted me to write this brief email urging you to support SB 30 and protect the Metolius Basin from development.

I also enjoy visiting Sunriver, Black Butte and skiing at Mt. Bachelor. However, the Metolius river basin is not the place to exploit and commercially develop. We need to keep areas in Oregon as pristine as possible and protect them for future generations to enjoy.

I will keep this short and sweet – I am in strong support and urge you to help protect our natural wonders in Oregon.

Sincerely,
Rob Gagnier
Beaverton, OR

Map Of the Metolius - LandWatch

Because many of you have asked for a map of the region, with the resorts and other relevant landmarks, here you go. Click on this image for a larger version.

-Central Oregon LandWatch

Keep Oregon An Outdoor Paradise - Debra Burke, Bend

[Sent to Rep. Burley, copied to all State Representatives:]

Leaving Oregon for almost any other place in the US makes you really appreciate what we have. Please work to keep Oregon an outdoor paradise and to maintain as many intact ecosystems as possible. Please support Measure 30.

Debra Burke
Bend, OR

The Metolius At Rest - Jon Sheldahl

So many Reasons For Concern - Mardi Wood, Bolinas, CA

[Sent to all State Representatives:]

I am disappointed and angry that the Jefferson County commissioners changed the land use law to permit these developments in the surrounds of the Metolius Basin. I am an owner with my family of undeveloped Metolius river property and we are very upset about this situation. This is a pristine, extremely beautiful, and "in-balance" area and community. Destination resort homes and their lure of golf courses, swimming pools, etc. will increase traffic, auto exhaust, pavement, septic/sewage needs and the need for more water. Converting the use of the water, the earth, the watershed, the trees, and all that now comprises and balances this natural place will be threatened, be easily overpowered and diminished forever during our lives, the lives of our children, and all generations to come. It must be saved. People from all Oregon, throughout the United States and from all over the world visit this area and are amazed by its beauty and historic naturalness. It is one place on earth that still exists where many people come to renew their spirit, their love of nature, their connection to the earth and this beautiful river. How can one take that from them? A short term [in terms of long term affect] need for tax revenue has caused the thinking and decision making into making bad decisions. So please help reverse this.

In learning more about this situation I am very concerned about the seriousness of forest fires and the cost to taxpayers tp protect any such developments. The Black Butte Fire caused us to move all my mothers posessions out of her house which was in danger of that fire. A few years later there was the B&B fire. I am concerned about the aquafir, the tremendous increases use of water and how it will affect the metolius river and itsw fisheries, the headwaters that come out of the ground right under Green Ridge. Have you considered the increase in traffic in this small area, the auto emissions pollution? Please support SB 30, I urge you!
Thank you very much.

Sincerely,
Mardi Wood
Bolinas, CA

You Can Make A Difference - Mark Inkster, Lake Oswego

Dear Representative Hunt,

As you've seen in the emails I've sent to other representatives, I strongly urge you to support SB 30 and to help preserve one of the most special places in the state of Oregon.

In your position of leadership, you can make a major difference in the passage of this bill.

Best regards,

Mark Inkster
Lake Oswego, OR

Maintain Our Most Beautiful Spaces - Mark Inkster, Lake Oswego

[Sent to members of the House Rules Committee:]

Please support SB30 and help to preserve one of the most special places in the state of Oregon.

My family has visited the Metolius basin for five generations, and we consider it one of the most special, unique places in the world, and certainly something to be protected. As Oregon continues to develop, it's critical to maintain our most beautiful spaces as pristine places where we can go to appreciate the wonders of nature. I support economic growth, and I support real estate development. But these should be done responsibly, and with an eye to future generations. The Metolius is best appreciated as a quiet reserve, and large scale development in the Metolius basin is completely inappropriate.

Over the years, I have traveled all over the world, to more than 50 countries. When I come back to Oregon, I always appreciate the wonderful job that our ancestors have done to protect its beautiful places for everybody to enjoy. Whether it's the parks in Portland, the forests of the Cascades, the grasslands and wetlands of southeastern Oregon, our public coastal spaces, or many of the other beautiful places, many generations of leaders have decided to develop our lands wisely. I urge you to maintain this longstanding and proud tradition. It's a key part of what makes Oregon great.

It's a tradition that I have personally tried to uphold. Just a couple of years ago, I sold a piece of undeveloped property bordering Tryon Creek State Park to the State of Oregon at a below market price, because I believe in the goal of maintaining and protecting our beautiful natural places. Like many other Oregonians, I act upon my beliefs.

As a representative of many Oregonians, you have the power to protect this wonderful place, and to give a voice to its beauty. If you are not familiar with the Metolius River, Camp Sherman or Green Ridge, please take the less than 2 hour drive from Salem to see it for yourself and enjoy its calm, peace and beauty.

Thank you for representing me, the many many people like me who support this, and the generations of Oregonians yet to come who will benefit from your thoughtful and far-sighted leadership.

Best regards,

Mark Inkster
Lake Oswego, OR

Look Forward To Tracking How You Vote - John Sterling, Bend

Dear Representative Burley,

I am writing to urge you to support Senate Bill 30 as it was passed out of the Senate. As you know, the Metolius River watershed is one of Oregon’s natural wonders, and we in Bend are lucky to have it so near. I grew up fishing the Metolius, and have always marveled that such a river could simply emerge from springs near the base of Black Butte. Over time, I have realized that, though the river itself is spectacular, it is the relatively pristine nature of the surrounding landscape that makes the Metolius truly special. To allow resort development within the watershed would undermine the Metolius’ natural beauty.

We now have two small children, and I look forward to sharing with them similar experiences on the Metolius that my parents offered me. Please support SB 30, and ensure that the Metolius remains a special wild landscape, free of resort developments that, frankly, Central Oregon does not need.

Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to tracking how you vote on this important issue.

Sincerely,
John Sterling
Bend, OR

Monday, May 28, 2007

Please Vote To Protect The Metolius - Nancy Siverson, Portland

Dear Madam Chair Rosenbaum and fellow Election, Ethics and Rules Committee Members:

I am writing to express my full support for Senate Bill 30 that will ban destination resort development in the Metolius River Basin. I am concerned how the water needs of these proposed destination resorts will impact the fragile Metolius River Basin. Adding almost 3,000 homes, two golf courses, various restaurants and all the contrived landscaping with the resulting sewage and other runoff can only impact a spring-fed pristine river such as the Metolius. The developers have promised the moon in regards to protecting the river yet leaving as it is is the only way to assure that my fellow Oregonians and generations to follow will have access to such a beautiful river valley. How will all the development impact other aspects of the Basin, including wildlife; and how does developing in a fire-sensitive area make sense? This area has seen increased foot traffic due to the growth of Central Oregon, and building directly in the Metolius River Basin will over-run the Camp Sherman area leading to the destruction of the Metolius River Basin. Oregon's history is rich with legislators who have had a visionary view of land use laws and environmental protection; legislators who were able to put politics aside and did the right thing for the environment and the present and future citizens of this great state. I respect that you have this same vision, because once it is impacted and ruined, it is gone forever. Thank you for your time and attention.

Please vote to protect the Metolius River Basin and pass SB 30.

Nancy Siverson
Portland, OR

Do The Right Thing - Jim Olmstead, Eugene

[Sent to All State Representatives:]

Please do the right thing and vote for SB 30, a bill which would protect the Metolious River and environs from inappropriate and unnecessary development. The Metolious River area is one of nature's rare gems: natural, scenic, rich in animal habitat and not yet spoiled by the inappropriate mega-development that has already stolen so much of Oregon's beauty.

Please be a legislative hero and do the right thing by protecting the natural areas that give Oregon its character. Please vote yes on SB 30.

Best Regards,

Jim Olmsted
Eugene, OR

Sunday, May 27, 2007

Addressing Rep. Dallum's Flip Flop - Katherine Livingston, Camp Sherman

[The following is a letter from Camp Sherman resident, Katherine Livingston. It is a response to a letter Rep. John Dallum sent to her (pasted below) in which he asserts his reasons for withdrawing his support for BS 30]

Dear Rep.Dallum,

Much has happened since I received your letter, but I am writing to address one comment you wrote, saying that "The Metolius Basin, I have learned is not as pristine and cared for as many think."

I have no idea what your source of information is, but it is wrong.

I have walked the riverside paths from the headwaters to below Wizard Falls since l928, camped on Barney Madsen's dairy on Spring Creek up from the store, as well as at various spots along the river. Many of my friends camp yearly at the Forst Service Camps. Neither they nor I have ever come upon trash and litter.

What many people do not understand is that those of us who have loved and appreciated the Metoliuus Basin over all these years, have kept an ever watchful eye on its welfare, teaching our children, our guests and the hundreds of vacationers who come here every year about their responsibility to keep the Metolius as pure and beautiful as the good Lord created it so many thousands of years ago.

Please come and visit, walk the paths and see for yourself.

Katherine S. Livingston
Camp Sherman

[From Rep. Dallum]
Mrs. Livingston,

My apologies for such a late reply to your email. The pace has stepped up dramatically around the Capitol.

I understand your disappointment. I withdrew my name from SB 30 when I learned that the local government process in place is doing what it is supposed to do. Currently the Warm Springs Tribes have filed an appeal with LUBA. For the state to step in and circumvent that process is to do damage to local governance. I am of the opinion that government happens best closest to home, rather than from a distance. I believe that the Jefferson County commissioners have taken everything into consideration, after hearing about the process they used to come to their decision.

As for the Metolius Basin, I have learned it is not as pristine and cared for as many think. Damage has been done by recreational ATV users and others who go into the area, damaging trails and leaving their waste behind, which the Forest Service, due to financial constraints cannot repair or monitor.

Dutch Pacific (Shane Lundgren and Jim Kean) seems to have great possibility for benefiting the area, not only as a means of commercial income. You will have opportunities to hear their concept of protecting the Metolius, as they have been holding informational meetings for the public in Camp Sherman and other locales. Both Lundgren and Kean have family history in the area.

I hope this explains my position so that you understand why I cannot support SB 30. Thank you for taking the time to write of your disappointment. I respect your opinions.

Sincerely,
Rep John Dallum
House District 59

Reasons To Support SB 30 - Becky Wood, Boise, ID

Dear Representatives:
I urge you to vote for SB 30 to protect the Metolius River Basin from resort development. Please consider the following:

1. The proposed development promotes private party profit interests only and is at a substantial cost to all Oregonians.

2. The proposed resort development would forever destroy the character and ecosystems of the Metolius River Basin which the public enjoys year after year. This great expense would be only to further private party interests.

3. The risk of fire in the area is extreme (please refer to my earlier research memo detailing wildfire risk and expense in the area) and is drastically increased with human imprint. If a fire occurred in the area due to the resort development, virtually millions of dollars of public money would be used to suppress it resulting in the developer's walking away with private profit at shocking public expense.

4. The proposed 3,500 home development would result in nearly 35,000 CAR TRIPS EACH DAY. This is intolerable for many reasons: this number of car trips would damage ecosystems, create pollution, contribute substantially to global warming, at a time when we should be reducing global emissions, and would forever change the nature and character of this extremely unique and scenic area.

It is absolutely essential to responsibly analyze the values that would be promoted by permitting resort development (and that value is simply private profits and limited increased tax base for just one county) and the extreme costs that Oregonians would bear as detailed above. The imbalance of the enormous public cost (and complete lack of public benefit) as it relates to the extreme private profit results in a shocking and indefensible subsidy of private profit interests.

As representatives, we are looking to you to prevent such shocking subsidy and we are looking to you to stand up and protect the priceless value of nature in this scenic area. There is a place for development and a place for human imprint and this is simply NOT the place.

Rebecca Biddle Wood Hardesty
Boise, ID