Dear Senator Walker:
I had the opportunity to attend the hearing held April 5 on this bill, and I am writing to urge you to pass SB 30 to stop the resort sprawl that threatens the Metolius Basin.
I have been involved in outdoor wilderness activities in Oregon’s Cascades for 35 years. When I began backpacking in our mountains in 1971, we were able to drink the water from the mountain streams without treating or filtering it. In the winter, the snow banks along the highway were well over our heads. However, since then all of the wilderness areas in Oregon have become polluted. There are still areas in the world where one can drink the water without treating it. The Patagonia of Argentina and Chile and the Southern Alps of New Zealand are two with which I am familiar.
The area that was designated as a possible site for a destination resort on the map of the Newton Consultants, Inc.’s handout lies due east of Square Lake and Booth Lake. These two lakes are just east of Three Fingered Jack, one of the peaks in our small range of mountain peaks that overlook the Metolius Basin. The destination resort site is about half-way between these lakes and Camp Sherman. This area constitutes some of the most popular hiking and backpacking areas for people from all over Oregon. The area has been overused in the past and has been subjected to a major forest fire in recent years. This area is recovering but is delicate. At this time there is no development on the north side of the highway. The only development is on the south side around Suttle Lake.
Because this area is so well used by all Oregonians, I feel that the Metolius Basin is a state issue and should be protected for all to enjoy for many years to come. I am greatly concerned about the impact a destination resort would have on this area. The glaciers in Oregon’s mountains are receding just as they are in the rest of the world. These glaciers and the annual snow pack are the source of most of our water. As the glaciers recede and the snow pack keeps melting earlier in the spring, this water source becomes threatened. Our main concern should be how to protect our primary water source. I commend the developer’s use of environmentally designed structures. However, any business has to attract enough clients to maintain a profit. Development amplifies the warming trends that affect our climate and water source and adds to the pollution of the area.
Destination resorts increase traffic in the wilderness areas bringing with it a large increase in carbon emissions from automobiles, traffic congestion, and accidents. The traffic going over the highway through the Metolius is already very heavy. It will also encourage over use of the surrounding areas. When humans encroach on the wilderness, the animals retreat searching for other places for their habitat. When one destination resort is allowed to be built, another will surely follow. When development like this occurs, we soon lose the beauty and pristine nature of the area that attracted us there in the first place.
I voted for Measure 37, but I voted to allow farmers to build a house for themselves on their own property, for a farmer to have a small restaurant to sell his own produce. I did not vote for Measure 37 to allow encroachment into our wilderness areas, and I do not appreciate developers’ threats to invoke Measure 37 when development that will adversely affect all of us is denied.
Sincerely,
Susan Watkins
Saturday, April 7, 2007
Regarding Withdrawn Support - Mark Dohrmann, Portland
Senator Dallum:
I wrote you once before asking you to support SB 30 banning Destination Resorts in the Metolius Basin and within a 3 mile radius. You've mentioned you supported it then withdrew your support:
After discussion with the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs and discover that they had not yet taken a position on the bill
After giving careful thought to the 'Fairness' of interfering in Jefferson county matters
Regarding your second point I'd like to make sure you understand that Jefferson County holding meetings in the basin and allowing testimony from locals is not the same as giving them 'fair' voice in the matter of changes to the Metolius Basin. Jefferson County DID not consult the Camp Sherman Local advisory committee, but did consult local developer(s). Jefferson County has since re-formulated there interaction with an advisory committee in a manner that leaves little opportunity for dissenting opinion.
Additionally, Jefferson County swept aside elements of the old County comprehensive plan that gave special protections important to the Metolius Basin. Clearly, the County is driven by the need for new revenue sources. It would seem they are willing to trade away an Oregon Landmark to achieve this goal.
Regarding your first point you say you weren't sure of the importance of the Basin as sacred ground to the tribes; are you aware that Cabin owners spend thousands of dollars each time any ground disturbing activity is needed around their property to assure that cultural artifacts aren't upset or lost? Do you think the Tribes AREN'T concerned about hundreds and hundreds of semi-permanent new 'residents' in their historical hunting, fishing and ceremonial grounds?
Senator, if gov't didn't on rare occasion intercede to protect State and National Treasures places like the Rogue River, Oregon's Coast line and Crater Lake would not be preserved as they are today. I don't believe anyone wakes up and says "Jez, I'm really sorry we protected those places".
Please renew your support of SB 30.
Mark Dohrmann, President
Metolius River Homeowners Association
Jefferson County Tax Payer and visitor to the Metolius these past 35 years.
I wrote you once before asking you to support SB 30 banning Destination Resorts in the Metolius Basin and within a 3 mile radius. You've mentioned you supported it then withdrew your support:
After discussion with the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs and discover that they had not yet taken a position on the bill
After giving careful thought to the 'Fairness' of interfering in Jefferson county matters
Regarding your second point I'd like to make sure you understand that Jefferson County holding meetings in the basin and allowing testimony from locals is not the same as giving them 'fair' voice in the matter of changes to the Metolius Basin. Jefferson County DID not consult the Camp Sherman Local advisory committee, but did consult local developer(s). Jefferson County has since re-formulated there interaction with an advisory committee in a manner that leaves little opportunity for dissenting opinion.
Additionally, Jefferson County swept aside elements of the old County comprehensive plan that gave special protections important to the Metolius Basin. Clearly, the County is driven by the need for new revenue sources. It would seem they are willing to trade away an Oregon Landmark to achieve this goal.
Regarding your first point you say you weren't sure of the importance of the Basin as sacred ground to the tribes; are you aware that Cabin owners spend thousands of dollars each time any ground disturbing activity is needed around their property to assure that cultural artifacts aren't upset or lost? Do you think the Tribes AREN'T concerned about hundreds and hundreds of semi-permanent new 'residents' in their historical hunting, fishing and ceremonial grounds?
Senator, if gov't didn't on rare occasion intercede to protect State and National Treasures places like the Rogue River, Oregon's Coast line and Crater Lake would not be preserved as they are today. I don't believe anyone wakes up and says "Jez, I'm really sorry we protected those places".
Please renew your support of SB 30.
Mark Dohrmann, President
Metolius River Homeowners Association
Jefferson County Tax Payer and visitor to the Metolius these past 35 years.
One of the Country's Most Beautiful Resources - John Wheeler, Eugene
[Sent to Senators Walker, Westlund, Kruse, Metsger, Morse and Representative Dallum:]
As a fly fisher, photographer and avid hiker, I wish to state my support for SB 30. The impact of the proposed resorts on the Metolius Valley would be devestating to one of the countries' most beautiful resources. Just the impact on the water flow from the aquifer alone could reduce the habitat of one of the last places in Oregon that supports naturally reproducing bull trout.
Sincerely,
John Wheeler
Eugene, Oregon
As a fly fisher, photographer and avid hiker, I wish to state my support for SB 30. The impact of the proposed resorts on the Metolius Valley would be devestating to one of the countries' most beautiful resources. Just the impact on the water flow from the aquifer alone could reduce the habitat of one of the last places in Oregon that supports naturally reproducing bull trout.
Sincerely,
John Wheeler
Eugene, Oregon
Friday, April 6, 2007
Valuable Insight - Tom Landis, Camp Sherman
[Sent to Senators Walker, Westlund, Metsger, Morse, and Kruse]:
Having driven all the way over the mountains to Salem from Central Oregon, I was disappointed that I did not get a chance to testify at the hearing for SB 30, which would prohibit destination resorts in the Metolius Basin. Furthermore, I feel that the opponents of the bill and the two developers received an inordinate amount of time to support their positions, since, by the time they had finished, proponents of the bill only had seven minutes left to testify. On thursday there is another hearing. Hopefully, those of us who support this important piece of legislation will have a chance to have our say.
I feel that I could have provided valuable insight to the committee, since I have been intimately involved with Metolius Basin land use issues for over 15 years. I was appointed to Jefferson County's Local Advisory Committee (LAC) for Camp Sherman in 1993 and served for 12 years, first as a member and then for five years as chairman. If you want a long perspective on the sometimes Byzantine ways that land use decisions are made and carried out in this county, I'm your man.
It has been my experience, over the years that I have been involved with land use issues in Camp Sherman, that Jefferson County seldom listens to the people of this community. Time and time again our community has spoken through our LAC, the committee tasked by the county commissioners themselves to give them advice. Almost every time we gave them advice on a substantive issue, they ignored it. I am not exaggerating. They asked us for advice. We gave them that advice. They ignored us. They just do not get the concept that the outstandingly unique natural values of this basin are more important than the interests of the developers they favor. We who live here in the Metolius Basin believe we have a better feel for what is best for the basin than the politicians and planners way over in Madras, not just for ourselves, but for all the Oregonians who cherish this area.
In my experience, at least where the Metolius is concerned, the county does not act in a responsible way, until and unless the state forces them to do something. During the 1990's this happened time and time again. In 1993 the state demanded that the county bring zoning in Camp Sherman into compliance with Planning Goal 14. In 1994, using the excuse that they just did not have the resources to rewrite the zoning ordinance, Jefferson County asked us (the LAC) to write our own zoning ordinance, promising that they would accept whatever we came up with as long as it was acceptable to the state. What we came up with was was a good ordinance, acceptable to the state. The county didn't like our ordinance, so they changed it substantially, negating the hard work of their own citizens. Of course, what they eventually submitted was unacceptable to the state. After a time consuming and difficult mediation process, the zoning ordinance that was finally enacted in 1997 was practically identical to the one we had submitted to them in the first place. What a huge amount of time, energy and money could have been saved if they had only listened to us the first time around.
When Jefferson county realized recently that they were getting left behind on the "destination resort bandwagon", lo and behold, they suddenly found the resources to completely rewrite the existing comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. They did go through the motions of a public input process and, to their credit, they did make some changes. However, on the most contentious issues, one of which is destination resorts, they refused to budge when faced with overwhelming public opposition. In the recent senate committee hearing they lauded themselves repeatedly for jumping through all the correct procedural hoops. They would rather spend a lot more time and taxpayers' money litigating this issue through the state's land use board of appeals (LUBA) because they think they have done everything right.
Jefferson County's process for enacting their new destination resort map, comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance has at least one major flaw, however. Zoning ordinances are supposed to be supported by a comprehensive plan and that comp plan is supposed to be supported by detailed resource analyses. There was no resource analysis done to support either the comprehensive plan or destination resort map that are now in the appeals process. The comprehensive plan is based on no current observable data. Nobody knows what conditions are on the ground today in the areas mapped for destination resorts. Whatever assumptions it makes are based on data that is over 20 years old. I know from personal observation that a large elk herd roams regularly over the property mapped for destination resort designation and there is not one word in any analysis to indicate that this land is in big game habitat. Obviously, much can and has changed over 20 years. Methods and sophistication of data collection have improved dramatically. This major flaw in the process of Jefferson County's attempt to so radically and quickly change their whole planning scheme is a dramatic example of why they cannot be trusted with land use planning in an area as sensitive and fragile as the Metolius Basin.
In conclusion, I am in favor of SB 30's passage, as is and without any amendments. The above examples are but a few of many very frustrating land use controversies I went through with Jefferson County. The Metolius is just too precious a resource to have it's fate decided by a county, that by its own admission, is motivated more by financial desire and the interests of developers than concern for such a special place. There is a strong need and ample precedent for the state to make the decision that there will be no destination resorts situated in or near the Metolius Basin. If you agree with me, please contact state senators Vickie Walker, Rick Metsger and Ben Westlund to communicate your support for bringing this bill out of committee to the floor of the full senate. Better yet, attend the hearing April 26th in Salem
Sincerely,
Thomas Landis
Having driven all the way over the mountains to Salem from Central Oregon, I was disappointed that I did not get a chance to testify at the hearing for SB 30, which would prohibit destination resorts in the Metolius Basin. Furthermore, I feel that the opponents of the bill and the two developers received an inordinate amount of time to support their positions, since, by the time they had finished, proponents of the bill only had seven minutes left to testify. On thursday there is another hearing. Hopefully, those of us who support this important piece of legislation will have a chance to have our say.
I feel that I could have provided valuable insight to the committee, since I have been intimately involved with Metolius Basin land use issues for over 15 years. I was appointed to Jefferson County's Local Advisory Committee (LAC) for Camp Sherman in 1993 and served for 12 years, first as a member and then for five years as chairman. If you want a long perspective on the sometimes Byzantine ways that land use decisions are made and carried out in this county, I'm your man.
It has been my experience, over the years that I have been involved with land use issues in Camp Sherman, that Jefferson County seldom listens to the people of this community. Time and time again our community has spoken through our LAC, the committee tasked by the county commissioners themselves to give them advice. Almost every time we gave them advice on a substantive issue, they ignored it. I am not exaggerating. They asked us for advice. We gave them that advice. They ignored us. They just do not get the concept that the outstandingly unique natural values of this basin are more important than the interests of the developers they favor. We who live here in the Metolius Basin believe we have a better feel for what is best for the basin than the politicians and planners way over in Madras, not just for ourselves, but for all the Oregonians who cherish this area.
In my experience, at least where the Metolius is concerned, the county does not act in a responsible way, until and unless the state forces them to do something. During the 1990's this happened time and time again. In 1993 the state demanded that the county bring zoning in Camp Sherman into compliance with Planning Goal 14. In 1994, using the excuse that they just did not have the resources to rewrite the zoning ordinance, Jefferson County asked us (the LAC) to write our own zoning ordinance, promising that they would accept whatever we came up with as long as it was acceptable to the state. What we came up with was was a good ordinance, acceptable to the state. The county didn't like our ordinance, so they changed it substantially, negating the hard work of their own citizens. Of course, what they eventually submitted was unacceptable to the state. After a time consuming and difficult mediation process, the zoning ordinance that was finally enacted in 1997 was practically identical to the one we had submitted to them in the first place. What a huge amount of time, energy and money could have been saved if they had only listened to us the first time around.
When Jefferson county realized recently that they were getting left behind on the "destination resort bandwagon", lo and behold, they suddenly found the resources to completely rewrite the existing comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. They did go through the motions of a public input process and, to their credit, they did make some changes. However, on the most contentious issues, one of which is destination resorts, they refused to budge when faced with overwhelming public opposition. In the recent senate committee hearing they lauded themselves repeatedly for jumping through all the correct procedural hoops. They would rather spend a lot more time and taxpayers' money litigating this issue through the state's land use board of appeals (LUBA) because they think they have done everything right.
Jefferson County's process for enacting their new destination resort map, comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance has at least one major flaw, however. Zoning ordinances are supposed to be supported by a comprehensive plan and that comp plan is supposed to be supported by detailed resource analyses. There was no resource analysis done to support either the comprehensive plan or destination resort map that are now in the appeals process. The comprehensive plan is based on no current observable data. Nobody knows what conditions are on the ground today in the areas mapped for destination resorts. Whatever assumptions it makes are based on data that is over 20 years old. I know from personal observation that a large elk herd roams regularly over the property mapped for destination resort designation and there is not one word in any analysis to indicate that this land is in big game habitat. Obviously, much can and has changed over 20 years. Methods and sophistication of data collection have improved dramatically. This major flaw in the process of Jefferson County's attempt to so radically and quickly change their whole planning scheme is a dramatic example of why they cannot be trusted with land use planning in an area as sensitive and fragile as the Metolius Basin.
In conclusion, I am in favor of SB 30's passage, as is and without any amendments. The above examples are but a few of many very frustrating land use controversies I went through with Jefferson County. The Metolius is just too precious a resource to have it's fate decided by a county, that by its own admission, is motivated more by financial desire and the interests of developers than concern for such a special place. There is a strong need and ample precedent for the state to make the decision that there will be no destination resorts situated in or near the Metolius Basin. If you agree with me, please contact state senators Vickie Walker, Rick Metsger and Ben Westlund to communicate your support for bringing this bill out of committee to the floor of the full senate. Better yet, attend the hearing April 26th in Salem
Sincerely,
Thomas Landis
Please Do Everything Possible To Pass SB 30 As Written - Joe Kuehn, Salem
Dear Senator Walker,
I am retired military and a Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
Please do everything possible to pass SB 30 as written.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
I am retired military and a Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
Please do everything possible to pass SB 30 as written.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
Deeply Grateful - Joe Kuehn, Salem
Dear Senator Westlund,
Thank you for originating SB 30. I and many others are deeply grateful for your swift and decisive action.
I am retired military and a Tom Mc Call Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
It was a pleasure to meet you yesterday after the hearing and shake your hand.
Please do everything possible to pass SB 30 as written.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
Thank you for originating SB 30. I and many others are deeply grateful for your swift and decisive action.
I am retired military and a Tom Mc Call Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
It was a pleasure to meet you yesterday after the hearing and shake your hand.
Please do everything possible to pass SB 30 as written.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
To Senator Metsger: Pass SB 30 As Written - Joe Kuehn, Salem
Dear Senator Metsger,
I am retired military and a Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
Please do everything possible to pass SB 30 as written.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
I am retired military and a Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
Please do everything possible to pass SB 30 as written.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
On Withdrawn Sponsorship - Joe Kuehn, Salem
Dear Representative Dallum,
I am retired military and a Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
I appreciate your position in withdrawing sponsorship of the bill. I admire your sensitive explanation and courage it took to reverse your position and realize how difficult it was for you. However, I sincerely regret your taking that step.
I hope you will continue to weigh both sides of this difficult issue and consider my comments as the vote approaches in the Legislature.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
I am retired military and a Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
I appreciate your position in withdrawing sponsorship of the bill. I admire your sensitive explanation and courage it took to reverse your position and realize how difficult it was for you. However, I sincerely regret your taking that step.
I hope you will continue to weigh both sides of this difficult issue and consider my comments as the vote approaches in the Legislature.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
Resorts Would Do Severe Damage - Joe Kuehn, Salem
Dear Senator Kruse,
I am retired military and a Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
You represent an area in which there are many special natural places similar to the Metolius. I hope you consider the need to keep these environmental lands protected from exploitation. Those who propose these destination resorts have become very skillful in couching their justification by devising ways to convince us that their projects are ecologically positive when they are not.
Please do everything possible to pass SB 30 as written.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
I am retired military and a Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
You represent an area in which there are many special natural places similar to the Metolius. I hope you consider the need to keep these environmental lands protected from exploitation. Those who propose these destination resorts have become very skillful in couching their justification by devising ways to convince us that their projects are ecologically positive when they are not.
Please do everything possible to pass SB 30 as written.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
Rare In Ecological Splendor - Joe Kuehn, Salem
Dear Senator Morse,
I am retired military and a Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
You represent an area in which there are many special natural places similar to the Metolius. I hope you consider the need to keep these environmental lands protected from exploitation. Those who propose these destination resorts have become very skillful in couching their justification by devising ways to convince us that their projects are ecologically positive when they are not.
I thought from the way you participated in the hearing that you were carefully weighing the testimony before making a decision. As the time for the vote nears I hope you will take my comment into consideration.
Please vote “yes” for passage of SB 30 as written.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
I am retired military and a Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
You represent an area in which there are many special natural places similar to the Metolius. I hope you consider the need to keep these environmental lands protected from exploitation. Those who propose these destination resorts have become very skillful in couching their justification by devising ways to convince us that their projects are ecologically positive when they are not.
I thought from the way you participated in the hearing that you were carefully weighing the testimony before making a decision. As the time for the vote nears I hope you will take my comment into consideration.
Please vote “yes” for passage of SB 30 as written.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
Make A Personal Effort - Joe Kuehn, Salem
Mike Carrier
Natural Resource Policy Director
900 Court St, NE
Salem, OR. 97301
Fax: 503 378 3225
Re: SB 30
Dear Mike,
I’ve included a letter to the Governor with this fax. I would add my name to the many others who have contacted you about this important place and piece of legislation.
Please do all you are able to encourage the Governor to make a personal effort to stop this destination resort sprawl and assault on the Metolius Basin.
Thank you.
Joe Kuehn
Salem, OR
Natural Resource Policy Director
900 Court St, NE
Salem, OR. 97301
Fax: 503 378 3225
Re: SB 30
Dear Mike,
I’ve included a letter to the Governor with this fax. I would add my name to the many others who have contacted you about this important place and piece of legislation.
Please do all you are able to encourage the Governor to make a personal effort to stop this destination resort sprawl and assault on the Metolius Basin.
Thank you.
Joe Kuehn
Salem, OR
Necessity To Pass SB 30 Without Compromise - Joe Kuehn, Salem
Dear Governor Kulongoski,
I hope you have an opportunity to appeal to the Legislature and the Warm Springs Tribes supporting preservation of the Metolius River Basin.
After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
We live in an area in which there are many special natural places. I know you consider the need to keep those environmental lands protected from exploitation. Those who propose these destination resorts have become very skillful in couching their justification by devising ways to convince us that their projects are ecologically positive when they are not.
Over four years ago I introduced my little grandson Joe to you “the next governor” after a rally on the capitol steps. I’ve hiked with him on the Metolius and hope he takes his son there to see it in a state much as it is today.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
I hope you have an opportunity to appeal to the Legislature and the Warm Springs Tribes supporting preservation of the Metolius River Basin.
After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
We live in an area in which there are many special natural places. I know you consider the need to keep those environmental lands protected from exploitation. Those who propose these destination resorts have become very skillful in couching their justification by devising ways to convince us that their projects are ecologically positive when they are not.
Over four years ago I introduced my little grandson Joe to you “the next governor” after a rally on the capitol steps. I’ve hiked with him on the Metolius and hope he takes his son there to see it in a state much as it is today.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
Retired Military and Republican: Save The Metolius! - Joe Kuehn, Salem
Warm Springs Tribes
Attn: Mr. Lewis Pitt
LPitt@wstribes.org
Re: SB 30 Hearing 4 05 07
Dear Mr.Pitt,
I am retired military and a Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
You live in an area in which there are many special natural places. I hope you consider the need to keep those environmental lands protected from exploitation. Those who propose these destination resorts have become very skillful in couching their justification by devising ways to convince us that their projects are ecologically positive when they are not.
I have backpacked with the Chemeketans of Salem from Lake Billy Chinook to Camp Sherman and have experienced the deep serenity of the Basin as I’m sure you have. Because of this experience I hold this place in a kind of reverence.
Please do whatever you can to ensure the Tribe’s support for SB 30.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
Attn: Mr. Lewis Pitt
LPitt@wstribes.org
Re: SB 30 Hearing 4 05 07
Dear Mr.Pitt,
I am retired military and a Republican. After attending the hearing and listening to all the testimony I am even more convinced of the necessity to pass SB 30 without compromise. This is my testimony which was not permitted because of time constraints.
• I've traveled on six continents to places as varied as a South America International Biosphere in Patagonia, New Zealand's Milford Track, and mountain wildernesses on remote Indian Ocean islands.
• These rare places are sanctuaries of nature protected from damaging human encroachment.
• The Metolius River Basin although more developed, is equally rare in ecological splendor.
• The location of the proposed destination resorts on the Basin's perimeter would in my opinion, do severe damage to the delicate Metolius environment.
You live in an area in which there are many special natural places. I hope you consider the need to keep those environmental lands protected from exploitation. Those who propose these destination resorts have become very skillful in couching their justification by devising ways to convince us that their projects are ecologically positive when they are not.
I have backpacked with the Chemeketans of Salem from Lake Billy Chinook to Camp Sherman and have experienced the deep serenity of the Basin as I’m sure you have. Because of this experience I hold this place in a kind of reverence.
Please do whatever you can to ensure the Tribe’s support for SB 30.
Sincerely,
Joseph W Kuehn Jr.
Salem, OR
Thursday, April 5, 2007
20 Weekends A Year Camping At The Metolius - Ervin Siverson, Portland
(The Following is Ervin Siverson's prepared testimony in support of SB 30 for the April 5th hearing. This was submitted into the record, but time had run out before it could be delivered orally:)
My name is Ervin Siverson and I live in Portland, OR. For full disclosure, I am not a developer, a real estate agent or a representative of some wildlife organization. I am not a lobbyist. I come to speak for what does not have a spokesperson or lobbyist, and that is the river ecosystem, the fish, and the surrounding flora and fauna of the Metolius River Basin.
My wife and I are avid tent campers and spend at least 20 weekends a year camping at the Metolius River. We know all the camp hosts, have hiked every inch of the river, and I have had the joy and pleasure of fly-fishing in its pristine waters. I hope that you legislators who are deciding the fate of this river have visited the Metolius River Basin; we have camped all over the west and nothing can compare to its unique beauty.
I went to the Metolius River last weekend to hand out fliers discussing the proposed destination resort development and the subsequent public hearing for Senate Bill 30. I spent three days talking with visitors at the Wizard Falls fish hatchery, campers at all the open campsites, and hiked the river to speak with my fellow fishermen who love the river as much as I do. I spoke with anybody who would listen to the threats that these destination resorts would pose to the Metolius River. I spoke to people from all areas of the state, and to many from other states who come to this special place to visit and relax.
In speaking to all of these people, several themes emerged that you legislators need to know before you decide the fate of this river. One, many people “had heard something” about the proposed development but were appalled to learn of the size and scope planned; and were shocked that the development would take place in the Metolius River Basin. I heard several people state “I thought the development was going to be in Bend or Redmond where it is already ruined.” I heard several people state the obvious, that this is a basin and all the run-off from the golf courses, contrived landscaping, septic systems etc. would end up in the bottom of the basin, which is the Metolius River. None of these people were for the proposed development and felt it would ruin the quality of the river. Two, most had their own personal story of how development in their neighborhoods had impacted their quality of life, from wells running dry to forested hillsides being scraped clean to build trophy homes for out of state visitors. Several said they were contemplating moving out of state due to the degradation of both the land around their homes and to the wildlife areas they visit such as the Metolius River Basin. Three, and maybe most important to you, is the lack of faith in believing that their legislators even listen to the ‘common man’ such as myself. All said they admired my dedication and passion to make a difference yet wondered if it is possible to fight the proposed development. I have to admit I was shocked and somewhat dismayed at the level of distrust my fellow man showed for the legislative process, yet many felt that the money to be made was too great to overcome. These opinions are from your constituency, I do not apologize for them, and I only report them so you know how the common man without a lobbyist feels about what is happening to them.
Bill Bellamy, Jefferson County Commissioner, was quoted in an Oregonian newspaper article as stating “Whether or not you like what destination resorts have done, its phenomenally significant what they do to property tax revenues.” The key phrase here is “what destination resorts have done.” What a decision you legislators have to make, opening the door to development within a basin that contains a pristine, federally designated Wild and Scenic River with endangered and federally protected Bull Trout, verses passing legislation such as Senate Bill 30 that would protect this river for centuries to come. It rests with you legislators, the legacy of what is to become of the Metolius River Basin, having to, as Bill Bellamy states, take the risk of what destination resorts will do to the river. I am not anti-development, I understand it needs to happen, yet why does it need to happen here? How have we lost the concept of protecting open spaces such as the Metolius Basin? If the Metolius River Basin can be developed, then nothing is sacred. And let’s be honest, these homes are not going to be bought by Oregonians. At $500,000 to $750,000 a lot, plus the same for the trophy home, these homes will be for the rich and famous. Is that what the State of Oregon has come to represent, a playground up for sale to the highest bidder? Or is it possible to return to what this State used to be known for, a State that had proactive land use planning and laws that protected its wild and scenic areas?
Finally, what is the State of Oregon’s responsibility to protect a federally protected Wild and Scenic River? What is the State’s obligation to protect a federally protected endangered species, such as the Bull Trout in the Metolius River? Let’s not fool ourselves, once you allow this proposed development to be built, others will follow and once the river is ruined and gone, it is gone. Its legacy is in your hands. Pass Senate Bill 30 in its current form.
Thank you for your attention.
Ervin Siverson
3509 NE Alberta Ct.
Portland, OR
My name is Ervin Siverson and I live in Portland, OR. For full disclosure, I am not a developer, a real estate agent or a representative of some wildlife organization. I am not a lobbyist. I come to speak for what does not have a spokesperson or lobbyist, and that is the river ecosystem, the fish, and the surrounding flora and fauna of the Metolius River Basin.
My wife and I are avid tent campers and spend at least 20 weekends a year camping at the Metolius River. We know all the camp hosts, have hiked every inch of the river, and I have had the joy and pleasure of fly-fishing in its pristine waters. I hope that you legislators who are deciding the fate of this river have visited the Metolius River Basin; we have camped all over the west and nothing can compare to its unique beauty.
I went to the Metolius River last weekend to hand out fliers discussing the proposed destination resort development and the subsequent public hearing for Senate Bill 30. I spent three days talking with visitors at the Wizard Falls fish hatchery, campers at all the open campsites, and hiked the river to speak with my fellow fishermen who love the river as much as I do. I spoke with anybody who would listen to the threats that these destination resorts would pose to the Metolius River. I spoke to people from all areas of the state, and to many from other states who come to this special place to visit and relax.
In speaking to all of these people, several themes emerged that you legislators need to know before you decide the fate of this river. One, many people “had heard something” about the proposed development but were appalled to learn of the size and scope planned; and were shocked that the development would take place in the Metolius River Basin. I heard several people state “I thought the development was going to be in Bend or Redmond where it is already ruined.” I heard several people state the obvious, that this is a basin and all the run-off from the golf courses, contrived landscaping, septic systems etc. would end up in the bottom of the basin, which is the Metolius River. None of these people were for the proposed development and felt it would ruin the quality of the river. Two, most had their own personal story of how development in their neighborhoods had impacted their quality of life, from wells running dry to forested hillsides being scraped clean to build trophy homes for out of state visitors. Several said they were contemplating moving out of state due to the degradation of both the land around their homes and to the wildlife areas they visit such as the Metolius River Basin. Three, and maybe most important to you, is the lack of faith in believing that their legislators even listen to the ‘common man’ such as myself. All said they admired my dedication and passion to make a difference yet wondered if it is possible to fight the proposed development. I have to admit I was shocked and somewhat dismayed at the level of distrust my fellow man showed for the legislative process, yet many felt that the money to be made was too great to overcome. These opinions are from your constituency, I do not apologize for them, and I only report them so you know how the common man without a lobbyist feels about what is happening to them.
Bill Bellamy, Jefferson County Commissioner, was quoted in an Oregonian newspaper article as stating “Whether or not you like what destination resorts have done, its phenomenally significant what they do to property tax revenues.” The key phrase here is “what destination resorts have done.” What a decision you legislators have to make, opening the door to development within a basin that contains a pristine, federally designated Wild and Scenic River with endangered and federally protected Bull Trout, verses passing legislation such as Senate Bill 30 that would protect this river for centuries to come. It rests with you legislators, the legacy of what is to become of the Metolius River Basin, having to, as Bill Bellamy states, take the risk of what destination resorts will do to the river. I am not anti-development, I understand it needs to happen, yet why does it need to happen here? How have we lost the concept of protecting open spaces such as the Metolius Basin? If the Metolius River Basin can be developed, then nothing is sacred. And let’s be honest, these homes are not going to be bought by Oregonians. At $500,000 to $750,000 a lot, plus the same for the trophy home, these homes will be for the rich and famous. Is that what the State of Oregon has come to represent, a playground up for sale to the highest bidder? Or is it possible to return to what this State used to be known for, a State that had proactive land use planning and laws that protected its wild and scenic areas?
Finally, what is the State of Oregon’s responsibility to protect a federally protected Wild and Scenic River? What is the State’s obligation to protect a federally protected endangered species, such as the Bull Trout in the Metolius River? Let’s not fool ourselves, once you allow this proposed development to be built, others will follow and once the river is ruined and gone, it is gone. Its legacy is in your hands. Pass Senate Bill 30 in its current form.
Thank you for your attention.
Ervin Siverson
3509 NE Alberta Ct.
Portland, OR
Recalling the 1989-90 "Save the Metolius" Campaign - Paul Dewey, Bend
Dear Committee Members:I am writing in support of Senate Bill 30 on behalf of myself (a resident of Central Oregon for nearly 25 years and not an owner of any property in the Metolius Basin) and those who participated with me in the 1989-90 “Save the Metolius” campaign. The “Save the Metolius” campaign was organized to stop U.S. Forest Service plans to greatly increase recreation development and visitation in the Metolius Basin. See the attached “postcard” from 1989.
The Campaign effectively argued to the State’s Congressional delegation, Governor and the Forest Service that such development was inappropriate for the Metolius and that the ecology of the area could not withstand the overuse that would result. As a result of our efforts, the Forest Service established the Metolius Conservation Area which was designed to protect the natural characteristics of the Metolius area.
Now some 17 years later the threat comes from private recreational/residential development in the form of destination resorts, and the reasons why they should not be allowed to occur are the same as we argued back in 1989. The Metolius simply cannot withstand the additional pressure that would be caused by destination resorts. With just the two currently proposed destination resorts there could be literally well over a 1,000 new homes within just three to five miles of the Headwaters of the Metolius. The attraction of these resorts/residential communities will of course be the Metolius itself. Treating the Metolius as an “amenity” for development is not appropriate or in keeping with the historical protection of this area.
There has been some question as to why there is a three-mile buffer in addition to the watershed itself. One reason is that if there is a population the equivalent of a new city within a few miles of the Basin, there will be a major impact from people who are going to drive to the Metolius because that is the major attraction in the area. Without the three-mile buffer, the proposed Colson resort could be as large as 4-5,000 acres, with literally thousands of homes and thousands of people who would descend into the Metolius. Part of the Colson property is just three miles east of the Metolius Headwaters and that part of the Colson property is considered to be “outside” the Metolius watershed. See the attached GIS map.
Another reason why there needs to be a three-mile buffer is that the wells for the Colson destination resort are to be located on lands outside the watershed. It is these wells which are proposed to pump 10 cubic feet per second which may impact the upper Metolius and the Headwaters of the Metolius. If Senate Bill 30 covered only the watershed then these wells would still be allowed as well as their impacts on the Metolius. It is absolutely critical that the three-mile buffer be retained in this Bill in order that the groundwater hydrology of the Metolius be protected. The shape of the Metolius watershed does not necessarily reflect the shape of the underground hydrology, and in this case the underground hydrology exists beyond the watershed.
I wish to express my thanks to Senator Westlund for introducing this Bill and appreciate the opportunity provided by the Committee to testify on this very important issue.
Very truly yours,
PAUL DEWEY
Bend, OR
Save The Metolius From Destination Resorts - Brian Hines, Salem
[Testimony to the Senate Committee on Education and General Government, April 5. Undelevered as time ran out.]
Save the Metolius from destination resorts
Short-sighted greed is poised to wreck the marvelous Metolius basin. It makes me sick. I strongly support Senate Bill 30, which would prohibit destination resorts in or within three miles of the basin.
My wife and I are part owners of a forest service cabin on the Metolius. It's the most beautiful river I've ever seen. The fly fishing is incomparable. The banks are wonderfully walkable. And you can even pause on your stroll and enjoy a latte at the oh-so-charming Camp Sherman store.
The permanent population of Camp Sherman is about 200. Jefferson County has pushed through changes to the area's comprehensive plan that would allow two destination resorts to be built in the Metolius basin, adding up to 10,000 people in the area at peak times.
Recently the Portland Oregonian ran a story about this travesty in the making, "The Metolius River Basin: Natural getaway or county's cash cow?" The most infuriating quotation came from Bill Bellamy, a Jefferson County commissioner: "Whether or not you like what destination resorts have done, it's phenomenally significant what they do to property tax revenues."
Wow, Bill. What a phenomenally ignorant statement to make. You're willing to ruin a world-class river basin so a few extra bucks can flow into the county's tax coffers.
Also infuriating was Bellamy's assertion that the county held public hearings before passing the resort zone and responded to concerns by paring down the size of the two properties earmarked for the destination resorts.
I know that the main hearing in Camp Sherman was packed with people opposed to the plan and that the opposition was virtually unanimous. I also know that the proposed Colson destination resort (on Green Ridge) is 10,000 acres, more than five times larger than the Black Butte Ranch resort, about six miles away.
How much did you pare down its size, Bill? From 10,001 acres? Thanks so much.
Yes to SB 30. No to Bill Bellamy and his property tax-crazed Jefferson County.
Sincerely,
Brian Hines
Salem, OR
Save the Metolius from destination resorts
Short-sighted greed is poised to wreck the marvelous Metolius basin. It makes me sick. I strongly support Senate Bill 30, which would prohibit destination resorts in or within three miles of the basin.
My wife and I are part owners of a forest service cabin on the Metolius. It's the most beautiful river I've ever seen. The fly fishing is incomparable. The banks are wonderfully walkable. And you can even pause on your stroll and enjoy a latte at the oh-so-charming Camp Sherman store.
The permanent population of Camp Sherman is about 200. Jefferson County has pushed through changes to the area's comprehensive plan that would allow two destination resorts to be built in the Metolius basin, adding up to 10,000 people in the area at peak times.
Recently the Portland Oregonian ran a story about this travesty in the making, "The Metolius River Basin: Natural getaway or county's cash cow?" The most infuriating quotation came from Bill Bellamy, a Jefferson County commissioner: "Whether or not you like what destination resorts have done, it's phenomenally significant what they do to property tax revenues."
Wow, Bill. What a phenomenally ignorant statement to make. You're willing to ruin a world-class river basin so a few extra bucks can flow into the county's tax coffers.
Also infuriating was Bellamy's assertion that the county held public hearings before passing the resort zone and responded to concerns by paring down the size of the two properties earmarked for the destination resorts.
I know that the main hearing in Camp Sherman was packed with people opposed to the plan and that the opposition was virtually unanimous. I also know that the proposed Colson destination resort (on Green Ridge) is 10,000 acres, more than five times larger than the Black Butte Ranch resort, about six miles away.
How much did you pare down its size, Bill? From 10,001 acres? Thanks so much.
Yes to SB 30. No to Bill Bellamy and his property tax-crazed Jefferson County.
Sincerely,
Brian Hines
Salem, OR
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
Staying True To Our Values - Mara Stein, Bend
Senator Vicki Walker, Chair
900 Court St. NE S-210
Salem, OR 97301
Dear Senator Walker:
I want to take this opportunity to also express my strong support for Senate Bill 30 which would ban destination resorts from being located in or within three miles of the Metolius River Basin.
The Metolius River basin is one of our precious natural environments in Oregon. We are already experiencing serious repercussions to the density buildups..and the destination resort construction in our tri-county area in Central Oregon. This is an important time to stay true to our values of the quality of life we want to preserve here...before the area becomes another unfortunate statistic.
I am also sending this e-letter to your Senate colleagues : Sponsor Sen. Ben Westlund, Sen. Jeff Kruse, Sen. Rick Metsger, Sen. Frank Morse, & Rep. John Dallum.
Thank you for the good work you do on behalf of the citizens of Oregon!
Mara Stein
Bend, OR
900 Court St. NE S-210
Salem, OR 97301
Dear Senator Walker:
I want to take this opportunity to also express my strong support for Senate Bill 30 which would ban destination resorts from being located in or within three miles of the Metolius River Basin.
The Metolius River basin is one of our precious natural environments in Oregon. We are already experiencing serious repercussions to the density buildups..and the destination resort construction in our tri-county area in Central Oregon. This is an important time to stay true to our values of the quality of life we want to preserve here...before the area becomes another unfortunate statistic.
I am also sending this e-letter to your Senate colleagues : Sponsor Sen. Ben Westlund, Sen. Jeff Kruse, Sen. Rick Metsger, Sen. Frank Morse, & Rep. John Dallum.
Thank you for the good work you do on behalf of the citizens of Oregon!
Mara Stein
Bend, OR
Stop the Resort Sprawl - Susan Watkins, Salem
Dear Senator Westland:
I am writing to urge you to pass SB 30 to stop the resort sprawl that threatens the Metolius Basin.
I have been an ardent user of the wilderness area of the Metolius for 35 years. During that time I have witnessed the effect of ever greater development in our wild areas. Many of us who have been active participants in outdoor activities were well aware of a global warming process long before it became a public concern. It seems to me that we should be doing everything possible to slow down the global warming process rather than allowing the creation of a destination resort which would amplify this phenomenon. Such large structures change weather patterns and conditions as well as have a tremendous impact on the water resources of the affected area.
In addition, destination resorts increase traffic in the wilderness areas bringing with it a large increase in carbon emissions from automobiles, traffic congestion, and accidents. The traffic going over the highway through the Metolius is already very heavy. It will also encourage over use of the surrounding areas many of which are already over used. When development like this occurs, we soon lose the beauty and pristine nature of the area that attracted us there in the first place.
Sincerely,
Susan Watkins
I am writing to urge you to pass SB 30 to stop the resort sprawl that threatens the Metolius Basin.
I have been an ardent user of the wilderness area of the Metolius for 35 years. During that time I have witnessed the effect of ever greater development in our wild areas. Many of us who have been active participants in outdoor activities were well aware of a global warming process long before it became a public concern. It seems to me that we should be doing everything possible to slow down the global warming process rather than allowing the creation of a destination resort which would amplify this phenomenon. Such large structures change weather patterns and conditions as well as have a tremendous impact on the water resources of the affected area.
In addition, destination resorts increase traffic in the wilderness areas bringing with it a large increase in carbon emissions from automobiles, traffic congestion, and accidents. The traffic going over the highway through the Metolius is already very heavy. It will also encourage over use of the surrounding areas many of which are already over used. When development like this occurs, we soon lose the beauty and pristine nature of the area that attracted us there in the first place.
Sincerely,
Susan Watkins
There Are Parts Of Oregon That Belong To All Of Us - Andrea Scharf, Yachats
Send To the Editor of the Bend Bulletin and to the Senate Committee on Education and General Government:)
Re: SB 30 Metolius Basin
Although I’m not a resident of the Bend area, I have family there and have been visiting the area for the past 45 years. When I was sixteen, I visited the Metolius River Basin on a family vacation. I have been back many times, to walk to the magical place where the river flows out of the mountain, to breathe the clear air, to rejoice in the serenity of a special place.
Certainly many other people enjoy this area and want access to it, but the construction of large destination resorts of the type currently being proposed (Colson and Dutch Pacific) will in fact destroy those very qualities that make the place so special. A bill introduced by Senator Westlund has the potential to stop this kind of development and deserves strong public support.
There are parts of Oregon that ‘belong’ to all of us, and there are resources that belong to all of us as well. A development with density levels more appropriate to urban areas rather than remote rural areas poses a serious threat—to water quantity especially. The Metolius draws from underground aquifers. Resorts of this size will draw down the aquifer and threaten the flow that feeds the river. This will jeopardize aquatic habitat, including world class sports fishing opportunities. An invasion of as many people as is anticipated by the resorts will diminish the recreation experience, putting many more vehicles on the roads; increasing air, noise, and light pollution; stressing wildlife; and generally degrading the area.
I hope that SB 30 is successful in stopping developments of this type in the Metolius Basin. Public support is critical. People should contact their legislators in Salem, whether they are from the Bend area or elsewhere in the state—or even out of state.
Sincerely,
Andrea M. Scharf
Re: SB 30 Metolius Basin
Although I’m not a resident of the Bend area, I have family there and have been visiting the area for the past 45 years. When I was sixteen, I visited the Metolius River Basin on a family vacation. I have been back many times, to walk to the magical place where the river flows out of the mountain, to breathe the clear air, to rejoice in the serenity of a special place.
Certainly many other people enjoy this area and want access to it, but the construction of large destination resorts of the type currently being proposed (Colson and Dutch Pacific) will in fact destroy those very qualities that make the place so special. A bill introduced by Senator Westlund has the potential to stop this kind of development and deserves strong public support.
There are parts of Oregon that ‘belong’ to all of us, and there are resources that belong to all of us as well. A development with density levels more appropriate to urban areas rather than remote rural areas poses a serious threat—to water quantity especially. The Metolius draws from underground aquifers. Resorts of this size will draw down the aquifer and threaten the flow that feeds the river. This will jeopardize aquatic habitat, including world class sports fishing opportunities. An invasion of as many people as is anticipated by the resorts will diminish the recreation experience, putting many more vehicles on the roads; increasing air, noise, and light pollution; stressing wildlife; and generally degrading the area.
I hope that SB 30 is successful in stopping developments of this type in the Metolius Basin. Public support is critical. People should contact their legislators in Salem, whether they are from the Bend area or elsewhere in the state—or even out of state.
Sincerely,
Andrea M. Scharf
On the Fence - Mark Dohrmann, Portland
(Sent to Senators Metsger and Walker:)
Word has it that you may still be 'on the fence' on the issue of SB 30, which provides some protection for the Metolius Basin from over development by destination resorts.
I can't urge you more strongly to understand and SUPPORT THIS BILL. With all that the legislators see cross their desks few will offer a clearer opportunity to protect one of Oregon's pristine natural treasures.
I have been a frequent visitor to the Metolius these past 35 years. I've heard Governors, Senators, and Mayors praise this place as worthy of protection. Here is the chance. This Metolius is too fragile to support destination resorts beyond those already in close proximity. There are adequate recreation opportunities for people to visit this area. There are insufficient water resources to support extended stay destination resorts, Jefferson County is hungry for revenue and has opened the door in a bad decision earlier this year. The Metolius Basin belongs to ALL Oregonian's and not just Jefferson County.
Please vote 'Yea' on SB30 and protect an Oregon icon!
Mark Dohrmann
Portland, Oregon
Word has it that you may still be 'on the fence' on the issue of SB 30, which provides some protection for the Metolius Basin from over development by destination resorts.
I can't urge you more strongly to understand and SUPPORT THIS BILL. With all that the legislators see cross their desks few will offer a clearer opportunity to protect one of Oregon's pristine natural treasures.
I have been a frequent visitor to the Metolius these past 35 years. I've heard Governors, Senators, and Mayors praise this place as worthy of protection. Here is the chance. This Metolius is too fragile to support destination resorts beyond those already in close proximity. There are adequate recreation opportunities for people to visit this area. There are insufficient water resources to support extended stay destination resorts, Jefferson County is hungry for revenue and has opened the door in a bad decision earlier this year. The Metolius Basin belongs to ALL Oregonian's and not just Jefferson County.
Please vote 'Yea' on SB30 and protect an Oregon icon!
Mark Dohrmann
Portland, Oregon
Keep Central Oregon From Becoming 'Exclusive' - Liz Rink, Bend
[Sent to Sen. Ben Westlund:]
Thank you for introducing SB 30 protecting the Metolius River. We have lived in Central Oregon for 30 years and have grave concerns about our natural resources and wild areas. How about some more National Monument protection for some of the waterways. It is sad to go hiking on trails we have used for years only to find fences and No Trespassing signs. Central Oregon is becoming exclusive by excluding the very people who have loved it for years (us) and centuries (the Indians and
wildlife). Keep up the good work, Ben.
Liz Rink
DE Rink Construction, Inc.
www.derinkconstruction.com
Thank you for introducing SB 30 protecting the Metolius River. We have lived in Central Oregon for 30 years and have grave concerns about our natural resources and wild areas. How about some more National Monument protection for some of the waterways. It is sad to go hiking on trails we have used for years only to find fences and No Trespassing signs. Central Oregon is becoming exclusive by excluding the very people who have loved it for years (us) and centuries (the Indians and
wildlife). Keep up the good work, Ben.
Liz Rink
DE Rink Construction, Inc.
www.derinkconstruction.com
Support SB 30 - Liz Rink, Bend
[Send to: Lewis Pitt w/ Warm Springs, Rep. John Dallum, Sen. Jeff Kruse, Sen. Frank Morse, Sen. Rick Metsger, Sen. Vicki Walker:]
Please support Sen. Westlund's SB to protect the Metolius River basin. We
have lived in Central Oregon for 30 years and have grave concerns about our
natural resources and wild areas.
Thank you,
Liz Rink
DE Rink Construction, Inc.
www.derinkconstruction.com
Please support Sen. Westlund's SB to protect the Metolius River basin. We
have lived in Central Oregon for 30 years and have grave concerns about our
natural resources and wild areas.
Thank you,
Liz Rink
DE Rink Construction, Inc.
www.derinkconstruction.com
Urging Your Support - Marianne Fellner, Bend
[Sent to Senators Westlund, Morse, Metsger, Kruse, and Walker, and Reps. Whisnant, Burley, and Dallum, and Gov. Ted Kulongoski:]
I urge you to support SB30 and protect the Metolius River from the encroaching pressures of developments and destination resorts. As a unique, world-class resource, the Metolius River and it's drainage basin deserves the same protection granted to protect the Columbia River Gorge. The Metolius' natural beauty and unique ecology should not be commercialized into environmental degradation. Please support laws that protect our natural resources from rampant development and exploitation. We must maintain a buffer around our natural treasures.
Thank you,
Marianne Fellner
Bend, OR
I urge you to support SB30 and protect the Metolius River from the encroaching pressures of developments and destination resorts. As a unique, world-class resource, the Metolius River and it's drainage basin deserves the same protection granted to protect the Columbia River Gorge. The Metolius' natural beauty and unique ecology should not be commercialized into environmental degradation. Please support laws that protect our natural resources from rampant development and exploitation. We must maintain a buffer around our natural treasures.
Thank you,
Marianne Fellner
Bend, OR
Keep The Metolius A Wild And Scenic River - Mike McAvoy, Portland
[letter submitted to the Oregonian:]
Dear Editor,
Development once again threatens Oregon’s waterways. Two massive mega-resort developments – over 13,000 acres and 4000 units are being planned along one of Oregon’s most fragile and pristine wilderness areas – the Metolius River. Developers are working back room deals with politicians to push this development into the Metolius River basin which has federal recognition as a Wild and Scenic River.
Sen. Ben Westlund, D-Tumalo, has introduced Senate Bill 30 on the behalf of the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, in an effort to stave off development along the Metolius, one of the West’s most beautiful river basins. The Metolius, known as a blue ribbon fishery, is a cool, clear river fed by underground springs and aquifers before heading on to Lake Billy Chinook. This gem of a river is home to numerous native fish species including the Federally protected threatened Bull Trout and is an area popular with campers, hikers, kayakers, fishermen and women, nature lovers and bird watching enthusiasts The town of Camp Sherman is as it has been since it was first established – a stopping place for those recreating in the area, a place to grab a piece of pie, find out where the fish are biting, pick up necessities for the camp trip or just walk and enjoy the tall pines.
The Metolius is one of those very special places in Oregon which makes our state so unique. Amongst the trees and the rushing river, the Metolius is as it has been for centuries, a place of beauty to be enjoyed by all.
Oregon’s scenic areas are under siege by the developers bull dozers. The people of Oregon and our elected officials need to stand up and determine if we’re going to let our wilderness be bought and paved to be used as a playground for the rich.
I support Senator Westlund in his fight to keep the Metolius River a wild and scenic river – I support SB 30 and hope others will as well.
Sincerely,
Mike McAvoy
Portland, OR
Dear Editor,
Development once again threatens Oregon’s waterways. Two massive mega-resort developments – over 13,000 acres and 4000 units are being planned along one of Oregon’s most fragile and pristine wilderness areas – the Metolius River. Developers are working back room deals with politicians to push this development into the Metolius River basin which has federal recognition as a Wild and Scenic River.
Sen. Ben Westlund, D-Tumalo, has introduced Senate Bill 30 on the behalf of the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, in an effort to stave off development along the Metolius, one of the West’s most beautiful river basins. The Metolius, known as a blue ribbon fishery, is a cool, clear river fed by underground springs and aquifers before heading on to Lake Billy Chinook. This gem of a river is home to numerous native fish species including the Federally protected threatened Bull Trout and is an area popular with campers, hikers, kayakers, fishermen and women, nature lovers and bird watching enthusiasts The town of Camp Sherman is as it has been since it was first established – a stopping place for those recreating in the area, a place to grab a piece of pie, find out where the fish are biting, pick up necessities for the camp trip or just walk and enjoy the tall pines.
The Metolius is one of those very special places in Oregon which makes our state so unique. Amongst the trees and the rushing river, the Metolius is as it has been for centuries, a place of beauty to be enjoyed by all.
Oregon’s scenic areas are under siege by the developers bull dozers. The people of Oregon and our elected officials need to stand up and determine if we’re going to let our wilderness be bought and paved to be used as a playground for the rich.
I support Senator Westlund in his fight to keep the Metolius River a wild and scenic river – I support SB 30 and hope others will as well.
Sincerely,
Mike McAvoy
Portland, OR
Too Important To Compromise - Mike McAvoy, Portland
Dear Senator Westlund,
Thank you for this email response. I agree with you tremendously in that the Metolius river basin must be protected against development. I strongly encourage you to keep up the fight. I know too often in politics and in life there are compromises that need to be made. However, also in life there are things that must be fought for, things which are too important to compromise. The Metolius river is one of those things we cannot compromise. If this proposed development goes in along the Metolius river, this gem of our state will be destroyed. There is no co-existence of a natural wild and scenic river with a 10,000 acre development with 3700 homes, numerous golf courses, shops, paved roads, etc.
I urge you to keep up the fight for the Metolius. It is definitely something worth fighting for. I’ll write a letter to the editor of my local newspaper as well as the editor of the Bend Bulletin.
Sincerely,
Mike McAvoy
Portland, OR
Thank you for this email response. I agree with you tremendously in that the Metolius river basin must be protected against development. I strongly encourage you to keep up the fight. I know too often in politics and in life there are compromises that need to be made. However, also in life there are things that must be fought for, things which are too important to compromise. The Metolius river is one of those things we cannot compromise. If this proposed development goes in along the Metolius river, this gem of our state will be destroyed. There is no co-existence of a natural wild and scenic river with a 10,000 acre development with 3700 homes, numerous golf courses, shops, paved roads, etc.
I urge you to keep up the fight for the Metolius. It is definitely something worth fighting for. I’ll write a letter to the editor of my local newspaper as well as the editor of the Bend Bulletin.
Sincerely,
Mike McAvoy
Portland, OR
Native Fish Society Supports SB 30 - Tom Davis, Sisters
Senator Ben Westlund
900 Court St, NE, S318
Salem, OR 97301
Subject: Support For SB 30
Senator Westlund and Members of the Oregon Senate:
The Native Fish Society enthusiastically supports Senate Bill 30 because the aquatic health of the Metolius River depends on its watershed. Destination resorts in the watershed are incompatible with clean water, high quality spawning gravel and the world-class native fish of the Metolius.
In addition to the Metolius and it’s threatened bull trout, the tributary waters, particularly Fly Creek, are exceptionally important because of the existence of isolated populations of native Redbands, a valuable genetic resource. Based on USGS reports the deep and shallow groundwater from the Colson parcel would flow toward, and discharge into, Fly Creek and other Metolius tributaries, likely carrying contaminants such as nitrate from wastewater systems at the resorts. Such pollutants would pose a major threat to the valuable, genetic reserves of native fish.
Whychus Creek water quality will also be impacted. It is one of the primary destinations for reintroduced, native Steelhead. This is a nationally significant opportunity for re-establishing native fish in habitat that has been blocked from anadromous fish access for decades, and is the result of the Pelton – Round Butte relicensing agreements.
The sediment from soil erosion during construction, roads and other results of development at the potential destination resorts also poses a serious threat to spawning gravel and aquatic health.
Throughout our history we have usually given the benefit of any uncertainty to potential profit at the expense of precarious, natural resources such as native fish. Our decision-making usually places the burden of proof on non-market values, such as native fish. The watersheds of the Metolius including Fly Creek, and Whychus Creek, are of such high quality and value that this process deserves to be reversed. Senate Bill 30 accomplishes that and the Native Fish Society urges its passage.
Thank you for leading on this important legislation.
Tom Davis, PE (inactive)
Upper Deschutes River Steward, Native Fish Society
Sister, OR
900 Court St, NE, S318
Salem, OR 97301
Subject: Support For SB 30
Senator Westlund and Members of the Oregon Senate:
The Native Fish Society enthusiastically supports Senate Bill 30 because the aquatic health of the Metolius River depends on its watershed. Destination resorts in the watershed are incompatible with clean water, high quality spawning gravel and the world-class native fish of the Metolius.
In addition to the Metolius and it’s threatened bull trout, the tributary waters, particularly Fly Creek, are exceptionally important because of the existence of isolated populations of native Redbands, a valuable genetic resource. Based on USGS reports the deep and shallow groundwater from the Colson parcel would flow toward, and discharge into, Fly Creek and other Metolius tributaries, likely carrying contaminants such as nitrate from wastewater systems at the resorts. Such pollutants would pose a major threat to the valuable, genetic reserves of native fish.
Whychus Creek water quality will also be impacted. It is one of the primary destinations for reintroduced, native Steelhead. This is a nationally significant opportunity for re-establishing native fish in habitat that has been blocked from anadromous fish access for decades, and is the result of the Pelton – Round Butte relicensing agreements.
The sediment from soil erosion during construction, roads and other results of development at the potential destination resorts also poses a serious threat to spawning gravel and aquatic health.
Throughout our history we have usually given the benefit of any uncertainty to potential profit at the expense of precarious, natural resources such as native fish. Our decision-making usually places the burden of proof on non-market values, such as native fish. The watersheds of the Metolius including Fly Creek, and Whychus Creek, are of such high quality and value that this process deserves to be reversed. Senate Bill 30 accomplishes that and the Native Fish Society urges its passage.
Thank you for leading on this important legislation.
Tom Davis, PE (inactive)
Upper Deschutes River Steward, Native Fish Society
Sister, OR
Amenity Migration and Impacts of Large-Scale Resorts - Darcy McNamara, Bend
Senator Ben Westlund,
Thank you for taking a stand for the Metolius against destination resorts. I would like to share with you some recently published research on the topic of “amenity migration” as it relates to the Metolius and Central Oregon and I would pose the following question:
Did the decision makers in Jefferson County review the existing research on amenity migration and the impacts of large-scale resorts prior to making their decision to permit them? If not, then perhaps a time-out is in order.
“Amenity migrant" is a phase coined in the 80's by social scientists to describe people who seek to move into areas with high natural resource quality such as the Metolius. The rise in amenity migration is occurring in the West primarily due to increases available wealth, time (retirees), and availability of technologies such as Internet connectivity in previously remote areas.
The recently released textbook The Amenity Migrants, edited by Laurence Moss, documents the environmental, social and economic impacts to mountain communities resulting from the mass migration of people seeking to live in beautiful places like Santa Fe, Whistler, British Columbia and Jackson Hole. This is the first book to gather the knowledge about this movement. In the book, you learn that while amenity migration is a worldwide phenomenon, most jurisdictions are barely aware of the concept -- and are suffering because of it.
Some cities, such as Santa Fe, ignored the warnings of the impacts of amenity migration twenty years ago in their policy decisions and today are suffering the consequences. And for better or worse Bend, Oregon is being cited as a “poster child” of amenity migration on a USDA website along with Jackson Hole and Sedona. (http://www.csrees.usda.gov/nea/nre/pdfs/amenity_migration.pdf)
A quote in The Amenity Migrants caught my eye: "Existing information about amenity migration indicates it is bringing about considerable physical change in the natural environment and human settlements of mountain areas. And the more this population grows, the greater is its likely impact."
An increase in destination resorts is a manifestation of the amenity migrants. While the focus of much of the debate surrounding the Metolius is about the environment, the social change that comes with a huge population influx of amenity migrants who will flock to the resort on a full-time or part-time basis is also an issue. The detrimental effects on society that result from a flood of amenity migrants are being documented by social scientists and researchers. These effects include:
• stress on traditional norms and behaviors resulting in turmoil and conflict in the community
• conflict between the core values of newcomers and the locals
• consumption of resources increases dramatically
• displacement of locals by price increases that are beyond their means (esp. real estate prices)
• profit by some but hardship results for many locals
• tensions rise over the expectations of migrants who will expect or demand a higher level of public services than the local jurisdictions can afford.
The study of amenity migration is an emerging field of research and the social, economic and environmental impacts of destination resorts are just beginning to be understood. A quote from another USDA website states: “Mobility and amenity-driven migration are major forces reshaping many rural areas. The more mobilized nature of employment, retirement, and lifestyles, which increasingly involve circulating through geographically extended social networks, has enormous impact on public lands and amenity landscapes.” http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/value/Amenity%20Migration%20and%20Recreational%20Homes.html.
Senator Westlund, I strongly support your efforts and encourage you to forge ahead with your plan to keep large-scale destination resorts out of the Metolius. But please do not stop there. Because the Metolius is a highly desirable area it is very vulnerable to the impacts of amenity migration. Defeating one set of resorts in the Metolius won’t save it from an uncertain future.
I urge you to form a task force to review the phenomenon of amenity migration as it effects Central Oregon so we can learn from other communities and not be the next example of failed planning in a textbook.
Sincerely,
Darcy McNamara
Bend, OR
Thank you for taking a stand for the Metolius against destination resorts. I would like to share with you some recently published research on the topic of “amenity migration” as it relates to the Metolius and Central Oregon and I would pose the following question:
Did the decision makers in Jefferson County review the existing research on amenity migration and the impacts of large-scale resorts prior to making their decision to permit them? If not, then perhaps a time-out is in order.
“Amenity migrant" is a phase coined in the 80's by social scientists to describe people who seek to move into areas with high natural resource quality such as the Metolius. The rise in amenity migration is occurring in the West primarily due to increases available wealth, time (retirees), and availability of technologies such as Internet connectivity in previously remote areas.
The recently released textbook The Amenity Migrants, edited by Laurence Moss, documents the environmental, social and economic impacts to mountain communities resulting from the mass migration of people seeking to live in beautiful places like Santa Fe, Whistler, British Columbia and Jackson Hole. This is the first book to gather the knowledge about this movement. In the book, you learn that while amenity migration is a worldwide phenomenon, most jurisdictions are barely aware of the concept -- and are suffering because of it.
Some cities, such as Santa Fe, ignored the warnings of the impacts of amenity migration twenty years ago in their policy decisions and today are suffering the consequences. And for better or worse Bend, Oregon is being cited as a “poster child” of amenity migration on a USDA website along with Jackson Hole and Sedona. (http://www.csrees.usda.gov/nea/nre/pdfs/amenity_migration.pdf)
A quote in The Amenity Migrants caught my eye: "Existing information about amenity migration indicates it is bringing about considerable physical change in the natural environment and human settlements of mountain areas. And the more this population grows, the greater is its likely impact."
An increase in destination resorts is a manifestation of the amenity migrants. While the focus of much of the debate surrounding the Metolius is about the environment, the social change that comes with a huge population influx of amenity migrants who will flock to the resort on a full-time or part-time basis is also an issue. The detrimental effects on society that result from a flood of amenity migrants are being documented by social scientists and researchers. These effects include:
• stress on traditional norms and behaviors resulting in turmoil and conflict in the community
• conflict between the core values of newcomers and the locals
• consumption of resources increases dramatically
• displacement of locals by price increases that are beyond their means (esp. real estate prices)
• profit by some but hardship results for many locals
• tensions rise over the expectations of migrants who will expect or demand a higher level of public services than the local jurisdictions can afford.
The study of amenity migration is an emerging field of research and the social, economic and environmental impacts of destination resorts are just beginning to be understood. A quote from another USDA website states: “Mobility and amenity-driven migration are major forces reshaping many rural areas. The more mobilized nature of employment, retirement, and lifestyles, which increasingly involve circulating through geographically extended social networks, has enormous impact on public lands and amenity landscapes.” http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/value/Amenity%20Migration%20and%20Recreational%20Homes.html.
Senator Westlund, I strongly support your efforts and encourage you to forge ahead with your plan to keep large-scale destination resorts out of the Metolius. But please do not stop there. Because the Metolius is a highly desirable area it is very vulnerable to the impacts of amenity migration. Defeating one set of resorts in the Metolius won’t save it from an uncertain future.
I urge you to form a task force to review the phenomenon of amenity migration as it effects Central Oregon so we can learn from other communities and not be the next example of failed planning in a textbook.
Sincerely,
Darcy McNamara
Bend, OR
Tuesday, April 3, 2007
Don't Let The Developers Win This One - Marina Martinez-Cavallo, Bend
Dear Senator Westlund,
I am writing as a community member of Central Oregon and as a workforce and career education consultant, regarding SB 30 (Metolius). I want to express my overwhelming support for your senate bill. I have never written my senator before but this matter requires urgent action.
PLEASE DO NOT COMPROMISE THIS BILL!
I moved to Central Oregon a few years ago and have been visiting it quarterly for over twenty years. I have come to learn that the Metolious River Basin is a precious diamond in this land. People actually go there to restore their sanity and to remember why they live in this beautiful state. It’s not uncommon for people to call this area “a spiritual place.”
We need this senator. People need to find peace so that they can go on and deal with the changing global workplace, leaders they can’t believe in most of the time, and now the uncertainties of the global warming threat. Over 60% of marriages end in divorce, we have children taking care of their aging parents, and jobs that come and on a regular basis. We need a place that feels good and feels like “home.” In sum, this area is rehabilitative to most of us.
Quite simply, if we don’t take care of the precious landscape we have, it won’t be able to take care of us. PLEASE DON’T LET THE DEVELOPERS WIN THIS ONE! Don’t let us become another uncaring California!
Clearly, the Metolious River watershed is at risk:
• Destination resorts consume vast quantities of water (shouldn’t we be saving?)
• Their golf courses, wastewater and pavement runoff can pollute surface and ground waters (Do we NEED more than 35 golf courses in an area this size? We have SO many ways tourists can enjoy our area)
• Thousands of more visitors will crowd the unique Metolious Wild and Scenic River (I have camped here for over 20 years; I already see the pressure from too many people. It’s getting much harder for this area to bounce back)
• Damage to the sensitive riparian areas and healthy fish habitat, not to mention wildlife like river otters will occur.
Please, Please, Please CONTINUE to be our leader on this. I so appreciate that you have stepped up to the plate. I was Shocked that a legislator did, and relieved that you and Representative Dallum did.
THANK YOU
Marina Martinez- Cavallo, M.S.
Bend, Oregon
I am writing as a community member of Central Oregon and as a workforce and career education consultant, regarding SB 30 (Metolius). I want to express my overwhelming support for your senate bill. I have never written my senator before but this matter requires urgent action.
PLEASE DO NOT COMPROMISE THIS BILL!
I moved to Central Oregon a few years ago and have been visiting it quarterly for over twenty years. I have come to learn that the Metolious River Basin is a precious diamond in this land. People actually go there to restore their sanity and to remember why they live in this beautiful state. It’s not uncommon for people to call this area “a spiritual place.”
We need this senator. People need to find peace so that they can go on and deal with the changing global workplace, leaders they can’t believe in most of the time, and now the uncertainties of the global warming threat. Over 60% of marriages end in divorce, we have children taking care of their aging parents, and jobs that come and on a regular basis. We need a place that feels good and feels like “home.” In sum, this area is rehabilitative to most of us.
Quite simply, if we don’t take care of the precious landscape we have, it won’t be able to take care of us. PLEASE DON’T LET THE DEVELOPERS WIN THIS ONE! Don’t let us become another uncaring California!
Clearly, the Metolious River watershed is at risk:
• Destination resorts consume vast quantities of water (shouldn’t we be saving?)
• Their golf courses, wastewater and pavement runoff can pollute surface and ground waters (Do we NEED more than 35 golf courses in an area this size? We have SO many ways tourists can enjoy our area)
• Thousands of more visitors will crowd the unique Metolious Wild and Scenic River (I have camped here for over 20 years; I already see the pressure from too many people. It’s getting much harder for this area to bounce back)
• Damage to the sensitive riparian areas and healthy fish habitat, not to mention wildlife like river otters will occur.
Please, Please, Please CONTINUE to be our leader on this. I so appreciate that you have stepped up to the plate. I was Shocked that a legislator did, and relieved that you and Representative Dallum did.
THANK YOU
Marina Martinez- Cavallo, M.S.
Bend, Oregon
Monday, April 2, 2007
Metolius Is Sacred - Nancy Siverson, Portland
(Sent to the Bulletin:)
We've all heard the phrase 'nothing is sacred anymore', well I'm writing to dispute this trite statement. The Metolius River in Central Oregon is sacred, and now two destination resorts are threatening the future of the Metolius River Basin.
The Friends of the Metolius, The Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, residents of Camp Sherman and our fellow Oregonians have nurtured and protected this spot for decades. The history of this area is rich with mention of the magic qualities to renew the spirit, and commune with nature. The headwaters of the river, where the water seemingly springs out of the earth, was given to the peoples of Oregon in perpetuity, not to be diminished by trophy homes, golf courses, restaurants, endless contrived landscaping, and segregation for the wealthy elite at the expense of most Oregonians.
Please join me at a public hearing on April 5th at 8:15am, hearing room B capital building Salem, to support Senate Bill 30, stop this before we all lose our sacred spaces.
Nancy Siverson
Portland OR
We've all heard the phrase 'nothing is sacred anymore', well I'm writing to dispute this trite statement. The Metolius River in Central Oregon is sacred, and now two destination resorts are threatening the future of the Metolius River Basin.
The Friends of the Metolius, The Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, residents of Camp Sherman and our fellow Oregonians have nurtured and protected this spot for decades. The history of this area is rich with mention of the magic qualities to renew the spirit, and commune with nature. The headwaters of the river, where the water seemingly springs out of the earth, was given to the peoples of Oregon in perpetuity, not to be diminished by trophy homes, golf courses, restaurants, endless contrived landscaping, and segregation for the wealthy elite at the expense of most Oregonians.
Please join me at a public hearing on April 5th at 8:15am, hearing room B capital building Salem, to support Senate Bill 30, stop this before we all lose our sacred spaces.
Nancy Siverson
Portland OR
