Dear Senator Walker,
Like all of us concerned about the Metolius River Basin, I have been thinking over the compromise your committee reached re SB30. It still leaves unanswered questions as to the environmental impact that a destination resort on Green Ridge would have, as well as to the cost to county tax payers for all the services huge destination resort would require, including the overwhelming costs of fire fighting in that very vulnerable area.
Would it not be possible and prudent to do a thorough environmental and economic impact study for the long term, before proceeding with what would be a short-term and disastrous solution?
I was very disappointed by what seemed your sudden swing from serious consideration of the fate of the Metolius River to a too-quick acceptance of the demands of powerful and vastly rich developers.
Please, come and make a few days visit to that unique work of Nature, or, of God, if you will, and you may be moved to change your course of action.
Very truly yours,
Katherine Livingston
Camp Sherman, OR
Friday, May 4, 2007
Thursday, May 3, 2007
Please Don't Allow The Destruction Of The Metolius River Basin - Michael Funke, Bend
[Sent to all State Senators:]
I am incredibly discouraged that the amended SB 30 opens the door wide for destination resorts in the Metolius River basin. I've visited Camp Sherman many times and fished the river from the Blue Hole on downstream. It troubles me to think what the future holds for that part of Central Oregon if these destination resorts are allowed to be built. There is a world of difference between destination resorts and the leased cabins that are presently along part of the Metolius River. Anyone who has visited the Metolius can't help but recognize that the permanent footprint of these destination resorts will squash the beauty out of this part of Central Oregon forever. We have already sen the proliferation of destination resorts permanently alter the landscape of Powell Butte and so many other parts of Central Oregon.
Please don't allow the destruction of the Metolius River Basin.
Michael Funke
Member, Trout Unlimited
Bend, OR
I am incredibly discouraged that the amended SB 30 opens the door wide for destination resorts in the Metolius River basin. I've visited Camp Sherman many times and fished the river from the Blue Hole on downstream. It troubles me to think what the future holds for that part of Central Oregon if these destination resorts are allowed to be built. There is a world of difference between destination resorts and the leased cabins that are presently along part of the Metolius River. Anyone who has visited the Metolius can't help but recognize that the permanent footprint of these destination resorts will squash the beauty out of this part of Central Oregon forever. We have already sen the proliferation of destination resorts permanently alter the landscape of Powell Butte and so many other parts of Central Oregon.
Please don't allow the destruction of the Metolius River Basin.
Michael Funke
Member, Trout Unlimited
Bend, OR
For The Greater Good - Tom Landis, Camp Sherman
Dear Senator Westlund,
It was great sadness that I watched Senate Bill 30 be so watered down in committee that the original purpose of the bill was completely reversed. Instead of providing the Metolius Basin protection from destination resort development, just the opposite in fact occurred. Under the provisions of the bill as amended, Jefferson County would have carte blanche to give destination resort developers almost anything they want.
I have been intimately involved with the land planning process in the Metolius Basin/Camp Sherman region for the last 15 years. If one thing is clearest to me, it is that Jefferson County has more concern for the tax revenues they can gain from development than they do for the outstandingly unique natural values of the area. This area desperately needs state protection from the special interests that would drive development at the county level, where dollars speak much more loudly than anything else. This is one of those times when the onus of planning simply must be taken away from local government for the greater good of the citizens of Oregon.
I urge you in the strongest terms to strip from SB 30 the amendment which turns its original protections into, simply, an invitation to developers. Return the bill to its original form and intent, which protects the Metolius River Basin and lands adjacent from destination resort development.
Yours very sincerely,
Thomas Landis
Camp Sherman, OR
It was great sadness that I watched Senate Bill 30 be so watered down in committee that the original purpose of the bill was completely reversed. Instead of providing the Metolius Basin protection from destination resort development, just the opposite in fact occurred. Under the provisions of the bill as amended, Jefferson County would have carte blanche to give destination resort developers almost anything they want.
I have been intimately involved with the land planning process in the Metolius Basin/Camp Sherman region for the last 15 years. If one thing is clearest to me, it is that Jefferson County has more concern for the tax revenues they can gain from development than they do for the outstandingly unique natural values of the area. This area desperately needs state protection from the special interests that would drive development at the county level, where dollars speak much more loudly than anything else. This is one of those times when the onus of planning simply must be taken away from local government for the greater good of the citizens of Oregon.
I urge you in the strongest terms to strip from SB 30 the amendment which turns its original protections into, simply, an invitation to developers. Return the bill to its original form and intent, which protects the Metolius River Basin and lands adjacent from destination resort development.
Yours very sincerely,
Thomas Landis
Camp Sherman, OR
"Dear Ben" - Carole Hancock, Powell Butte
Dear Ben - How very, very sad after all these years it appears the beautiful Metolius River/Camp Sherman area is threatened and in jeopardy of being completely lost and taken over by big money powered developers who seem be on a trek of completely destroying by rezoning peaceful retreats for the soleful purpose of monetary gain, with the promise of monetary allocation to unrestrained and overspending city/county/state government recipients. When is it going to stop?!!
I am a frequent visitor to the Metolius River, for a peaceful place of retreating. Please do all you can to not allow Metolius River/Camp Sherman to become rezoned for any purpose. Let's decide to leave some places completely alone for that purpose and that purpose only - to just plain leave it all alone. The area is available as it stands now to anyone who cares to make reservations for overnight and visit as frequently as possible.
The Metolius River has been unequivically protected by those in Camp Sherman who not only love their privacy and serene beauty of the lifestyle in Camp Sherman, but truly love the river, so affectionately referred to by many of us as the Melodious River. How very sad and threatening this must be to they who have worked so long and hard to safeguard this beautiful wilderness area.
As a child we visited and fished the Metolius River many times. I personally was privileged to live in Camp Sherman for one winter in an established cabin and witnessed wildlife yet to be hindered by big development areas. A whole herd of elk walked the river in the moonlight; deer meandered without fear of man; numerous species of ducks raised their young; bald eagles flew overhead, used dead tree stumps as perches; and the great blue heron fed along the Metolius shores, along with many other species of wildlife too numerous to name. To experience this wildlife, it required my calm respect of the land they own and trust. Cabin owners and friends of the Metolius have maintained river trails for years, protecting for respectful visitors what the Metolius River has represented for years - wilderness, and a place to go and escape without the noise and bustle of overpopulation.
I was born (1941) and raised in Redmond. Sadly watching Redmond change as our little town has been rezoned for huge development, and now living in Powell Butte, where destination resorts have been allowed to manipulate their way into Crook County and this farming community, it is my feeling as with any rezoning, this would be only the beginning of the ruination of the entire natural ecological structure of Camp Sherman Metolius River area, as we again fall under the manipulative power of those who have only personal monetary gain in mind and no thought of safeguarding the future of such areas. How very, very sad.
Carole Hancock
Powell Butte OR
I am a frequent visitor to the Metolius River, for a peaceful place of retreating. Please do all you can to not allow Metolius River/Camp Sherman to become rezoned for any purpose. Let's decide to leave some places completely alone for that purpose and that purpose only - to just plain leave it all alone. The area is available as it stands now to anyone who cares to make reservations for overnight and visit as frequently as possible.
The Metolius River has been unequivically protected by those in Camp Sherman who not only love their privacy and serene beauty of the lifestyle in Camp Sherman, but truly love the river, so affectionately referred to by many of us as the Melodious River. How very sad and threatening this must be to they who have worked so long and hard to safeguard this beautiful wilderness area.
As a child we visited and fished the Metolius River many times. I personally was privileged to live in Camp Sherman for one winter in an established cabin and witnessed wildlife yet to be hindered by big development areas. A whole herd of elk walked the river in the moonlight; deer meandered without fear of man; numerous species of ducks raised their young; bald eagles flew overhead, used dead tree stumps as perches; and the great blue heron fed along the Metolius shores, along with many other species of wildlife too numerous to name. To experience this wildlife, it required my calm respect of the land they own and trust. Cabin owners and friends of the Metolius have maintained river trails for years, protecting for respectful visitors what the Metolius River has represented for years - wilderness, and a place to go and escape without the noise and bustle of overpopulation.
I was born (1941) and raised in Redmond. Sadly watching Redmond change as our little town has been rezoned for huge development, and now living in Powell Butte, where destination resorts have been allowed to manipulate their way into Crook County and this farming community, it is my feeling as with any rezoning, this would be only the beginning of the ruination of the entire natural ecological structure of Camp Sherman Metolius River area, as we again fall under the manipulative power of those who have only personal monetary gain in mind and no thought of safeguarding the future of such areas. How very, very sad.
Carole Hancock
Powell Butte OR
Don't Turn Oregon Into Colorado - Trina Van Patton, Louisville, CO
To: Oregon SenatorsDear Senator __________,
I live in a suburb of Denver, Colorado. Most days I drive from my suburban tract home to my job in another suburb of Denver. I am surrounded by multitudes of people, on the road, at the malls, at work. It is a crowded, noisy existence with frequent smoggy days, aggressive drivers and roadways dirty with litter and grime.
BUT, twice a year for a week or two, my family and I are among the fortunate to visit Camp Sherman. Why do we drive or fly 2,200 miles round-trip to come to Camp Sherman instead of just heading up into the mountains of Colorado? Because, up to now, Camp Sherman and the Metolius offer an experience, a feeling and a restoration of spirit that we cannot match in our crowded Colorado Mountains with their mega-resorts, casinos and thousands of people. A weekend visit to our front-range Colorado mountains goes like this: 1. bumper to bumper traffic on the roadways and highways; 2. often impossible to find a place to park at the trailheads, scenic areas and ski areas; 3. once in the National Forests, the trails, lakes and picnic areas are so crowded with people and 4-wheelers that you might as well have a picnic in your own suburban backyard for a little more privacy.
It scares me to think that you might allow this same scenario to happen to the Oregon treasure that is the Metolius Basin. You would allow an exquisite area to be ruined for some extra dollars in the county’s coffers? As I expressed in an earlier letter to you, the forests and waters of the Metolius Basin are magical and special beyond words. I know this. I have been coming to Camp Sherman every chance I can for over 40 years now. It would be all too easy to destroy the delicate balance of the Metolius basin with the proposed (and possibly future additional) destination resort development and necessary infrastructure -- and it would be completely impossible to restore the Metolius area to the way it is now, the way it has been and the the way it should always remain. If Central Oregon needs more destination resorts (questionable in itself) locate them far outside of the Metolius Basin. Maybe a land swap should be considered for the current large parcel land owners/developers?
I may not be a water expert, a forest expert, a wildlife and fish expert, a sewage expert, a fire expert, a traffic expert or a city planner, BUT I can see, hear and even smell the severe impact of large development in my current home state of Colorado. Please, you MUST NOT allow the county and the developers to sway you in this decision. Listen to the experts who have written, listen to the majority of the people. We, not only Oregonians but people from all over the world, are depending on you to make the right decision, the informed decision, the ONLY decision, and support the ORIGINAL SB 30. NOT the compromised current version of SB 30.
I have always been impressed with the way Oregon has been a guardian of its land and waters. Please keep this tradition and stewardship of your beautiful state for my children, your children, people everywhere and all generations to come.
Sincerely,
an Oregon fan forever (I hope),
Trina Van Patten
P.S. A funny story: When I was a child and we would be packing the car to make the yearly summer trip to Camp Sherman, our family dog was so determined not to be left behind that she would escape from the backyard and plant herself in the family station wagon and just wait for us to finish packing and go. She would not budge from her spot in the car. The closer we got to Camp Sherman the more excited she became. Even a dog can recognize how wonderful Camp Sherman is! So please recognize the privilege you have of living within a few hours drive of the Metolius and remember those of us that cross half a continent or more to spend a little of our time in the pristine and unspoiled woods of the Metolius Basin. Please protect it for us!
Metolius Photo Essay on Westfly - LandWatch
Many of you have probably already seen the dozens of amazing pictures of the Metolius on the Westfly website. If not, they are here.
We have quite a few pics on this site, but nothing compared to Westfly.
We have quite a few pics on this site, but nothing compared to Westfly.
Few Phenomena Are More Magical - Dan Stevens, Eugene, OR
Dear Representative Vicki Walker:
[Sent to all State Senators:]
Few phenomena are more magical than the fountain from which the Metolious springs -- a beautiful, raging river. The clear, pure waters are exceptional so close to human development. However, this human development must be kept at a distance. A destination resort set on this land would forever alter this national treasure. Let’s not allow it so close to the source.
Sincerely,
Dan Stevens
Eugene, OR
[Sent to all State Senators:]
Few phenomena are more magical than the fountain from which the Metolious springs -- a beautiful, raging river. The clear, pure waters are exceptional so close to human development. However, this human development must be kept at a distance. A destination resort set on this land would forever alter this national treasure. Let’s not allow it so close to the source.
Sincerely,
Dan Stevens
Eugene, OR
Wednesday, May 2, 2007
Support The ORIGINAL SB 30 - Marie Sheahan Brown, Camp Sherman
[Sent to all State Senators:]
I urge you to support the ORIGINAL version of SB 30 to Save the Metolius. This bill was submitted because, last December, Jefferson County officials decided in favor of changing forestland into giant destination resorts. In doing so, they failed to consider adequately the significant harm to one of Oregon’s and America’s ecological treasures. The bill as currently amended would put the same official body right back in the bulldozer’s seat.
The Senate Education and General Government Committee’s April 26 amendment prohibits the resorts “UNLESS the county first finds that siting destination resorts in or within three miles of the basin will not have a significant adverse impact.…”
Why didn’t Jefferson County officials investigate the ample warnings of “significant adverse impact” in the first place? Clearly, in this matter of destination resorts, the officials see increased tax revenue as the overriding value. They have already shown, by their actions, disregard for the higher values of the Metolius Basin, of which many people have written eloquently and expertly. What incentive would these same officials have to honor the intent of the amendment? I suspect the easy tax money still dangling before their eyes would blind them to the ecological facts and allure them to work the amendment’s loopholes.
Money cannot buy the 10 Outstandingly Remarkable Values of the Metolius Basin recognized in its Wild and Scenic River status. Countless numbers of American citizens hold these values dear. Two giant destination resorts would surely harm the delicately balanced ecology, draining the Basin of the very values the resorts would exploit. No one has the right to do that. Money cannot buy what has been given to ALL the people by One greater.
Some of us working to Save the Metolius happen to own the relatively few parcels of private property in the Metolius Basin (the vast majority of acres being Forest Service land). We are not laboring to Save the Metolius only for ourselves. Most owners, alert to forces of harmful exploitation over the decades, have acted as caretakers of the treasure so that many people, generation after generation, from every country in the world, can visit the Metolius, rest lightly for a while, restore their spirits ~ and, we hope, do no harm.
Citizens now and future will thank you, Senator, for your principled support for the ORIGINAL version of SB 30.
Sincerely,
Marie Sheahan Brown
Camp Sherman OR
I urge you to support the ORIGINAL version of SB 30 to Save the Metolius. This bill was submitted because, last December, Jefferson County officials decided in favor of changing forestland into giant destination resorts. In doing so, they failed to consider adequately the significant harm to one of Oregon’s and America’s ecological treasures. The bill as currently amended would put the same official body right back in the bulldozer’s seat.
The Senate Education and General Government Committee’s April 26 amendment prohibits the resorts “UNLESS the county first finds that siting destination resorts in or within three miles of the basin will not have a significant adverse impact.…”
Why didn’t Jefferson County officials investigate the ample warnings of “significant adverse impact” in the first place? Clearly, in this matter of destination resorts, the officials see increased tax revenue as the overriding value. They have already shown, by their actions, disregard for the higher values of the Metolius Basin, of which many people have written eloquently and expertly. What incentive would these same officials have to honor the intent of the amendment? I suspect the easy tax money still dangling before their eyes would blind them to the ecological facts and allure them to work the amendment’s loopholes.
Money cannot buy the 10 Outstandingly Remarkable Values of the Metolius Basin recognized in its Wild and Scenic River status. Countless numbers of American citizens hold these values dear. Two giant destination resorts would surely harm the delicately balanced ecology, draining the Basin of the very values the resorts would exploit. No one has the right to do that. Money cannot buy what has been given to ALL the people by One greater.
Some of us working to Save the Metolius happen to own the relatively few parcels of private property in the Metolius Basin (the vast majority of acres being Forest Service land). We are not laboring to Save the Metolius only for ourselves. Most owners, alert to forces of harmful exploitation over the decades, have acted as caretakers of the treasure so that many people, generation after generation, from every country in the world, can visit the Metolius, rest lightly for a while, restore their spirits ~ and, we hope, do no harm.
Citizens now and future will thank you, Senator, for your principled support for the ORIGINAL version of SB 30.
Sincerely,
Marie Sheahan Brown
Camp Sherman OR
Message From Senator Westlund
No doubt, this is the good Senator's standard response to recent letters, but it lays out his stance pretty cleary. This was in response to a letter I recently sent:
Erik,
I am so grateful for your continued support in protecting the Metolius River basin. Unfortunately, the original legislation that I sponsored has been weakened.
After two hours of strong testimony and my introduction of hundreds of letters of support, the committee passed an amendment that makes the bill completely unacceptable to me… and I trust to you. The changed bill now allows resorts within the basin and gives the county the authority to map more if they choose. That’s the bad news… The good, is that at least the bill is still "alive" and hopefully we have the chance to amend it again so it truly protects the Metolius.
As it stands now, I cannot support SB 30. I voted against it as it was amended in committee and I will continue to oppose it as it is now written. The provisions do not protect the Metolius and some land use attorneys believe they actually make it easier for the county to site resorts!
The battle is not over …If we want to assure that this special place is protected for generations to come, then we must continue to support strong protections for the Metolius.
There is a time to compromise and there is a time to stand firm…I am standing firm. I ask you to stand with me and contact your legislators to ask that the bill be amended to reflect the original intent of SB 30 to protect the Metolius.
Ben
Erik,
I am so grateful for your continued support in protecting the Metolius River basin. Unfortunately, the original legislation that I sponsored has been weakened.
After two hours of strong testimony and my introduction of hundreds of letters of support, the committee passed an amendment that makes the bill completely unacceptable to me… and I trust to you. The changed bill now allows resorts within the basin and gives the county the authority to map more if they choose. That’s the bad news… The good, is that at least the bill is still "alive" and hopefully we have the chance to amend it again so it truly protects the Metolius.
As it stands now, I cannot support SB 30. I voted against it as it was amended in committee and I will continue to oppose it as it is now written. The provisions do not protect the Metolius and some land use attorneys believe they actually make it easier for the county to site resorts!
The battle is not over …If we want to assure that this special place is protected for generations to come, then we must continue to support strong protections for the Metolius.
There is a time to compromise and there is a time to stand firm…I am standing firm. I ask you to stand with me and contact your legislators to ask that the bill be amended to reflect the original intent of SB 30 to protect the Metolius.
Ben
Calling Oregon's U.S. Senators - Al Krause, Sisters
[Sent to U.S. Senators Wyden and Smith:]
I write to seek your help preventing the potential harm that could occur to the Metolius River basin with the recent decision by Jefferson county to allow for destination resort development in close proximity to the Metolius river. The Metolius is a federally protected river with "wild and scenic" designation as you know. State Senator Ben Westlund has attempted to avert development near the Metolius with state senate bill SB30, but it has been passed in committee without any protection of the river. Is there anything the Federal government can do to protect this Oregon "treasure" from being ruined?
Respectfully,
Al Krause
Sisters, OR
I write to seek your help preventing the potential harm that could occur to the Metolius River basin with the recent decision by Jefferson county to allow for destination resort development in close proximity to the Metolius river. The Metolius is a federally protected river with "wild and scenic" designation as you know. State Senator Ben Westlund has attempted to avert development near the Metolius with state senate bill SB30, but it has been passed in committee without any protection of the river. Is there anything the Federal government can do to protect this Oregon "treasure" from being ruined?
Respectfully,
Al Krause
Sisters, OR
RESTORE The Original SB 30 - Joe Fox, Eugene
Dear Senator Walker: As one of your constituents in Eugene, I write
to express my complete disappointment with the SB 30 amendments. The
Committee's failure to protect the Metolius, after all of the process
that preceded the hearing, is hard to swallow. I need not repeat all
of the reasons the Metolius should be protected. You have heard them
all already. The committee, with the exception of Sen. Westlund,
seems to have no sense of passing a natural treasure down to the
children of Oregon. You might as well pass a bill opening up all
college accounts in Oregon to be free for the taking by anyone who
would like a little money. If our own Senators don't have a sense of
protecting natural heritage areas for our children, who will? We
vote people into office on the belief that they will look beyond
immediate profit seeking ventures and consider the interests of the
future generations who will inherit this state and all of its
priceless natural resources.
Please RESTORE original SB 30, however you can do it, and do not
allow this horrible compromise to go forward!
Joseph William Fox
Eugene, Oregon
to express my complete disappointment with the SB 30 amendments. The
Committee's failure to protect the Metolius, after all of the process
that preceded the hearing, is hard to swallow. I need not repeat all
of the reasons the Metolius should be protected. You have heard them
all already. The committee, with the exception of Sen. Westlund,
seems to have no sense of passing a natural treasure down to the
children of Oregon. You might as well pass a bill opening up all
college accounts in Oregon to be free for the taking by anyone who
would like a little money. If our own Senators don't have a sense of
protecting natural heritage areas for our children, who will? We
vote people into office on the belief that they will look beyond
immediate profit seeking ventures and consider the interests of the
future generations who will inherit this state and all of its
priceless natural resources.
Please RESTORE original SB 30, however you can do it, and do not
allow this horrible compromise to go forward!
Joseph William Fox
Eugene, Oregon
I Appreciate What You Are Trying To Do Here - Patrick Buresh, Bend
Hello Senator Westland,
I appreciate what you are trying to do here. Maybe my story can help.
I am partially responsible for the growth in Central Oregon. My wife and I moved here with our son almost 5 years ago. We have since added a daughter and will be picking up our adopted son at the Portland airport on Saturday, May 5. So, I understand the need for development. However, the Metolius Basin is not the appropriate place for this development. It was once considered for National Park status! I would rather see Camp Sherman relocated and the land donated to the Deschutes Basin Land Trust then see more building near the basin. It is more appropriate to quadruple the number of people in the city of Sisters than put those people in a couple new cities near the Metolius River.
Last spring I visited my Grandpa Vetz – my last living grandparent. He was a WWII vet who trained in Camp Abbot (near Sunriver) and loved to fish. His time at Camp Abbot was one of the few things he was able to talk about during that visit. At times he couldn’t remember who I was or how many times we had walked around his apartment. But, he could remember playing in the snow in Central Oregon. I was able to convince my Uncle Rod that Grandpa’s old bamboo fly rod should come home with me. The only place I considered for that rod’s first outing in more than 20 years was the Metolius River. I have attached a picture (MetBowSmall.jpg) of the first fish I caught with the rod – a beautiful wild Metolius rainbow.
Grandpa died in early February. I headed to the Metolius with his old bamboo fly rod the next day. I was not able to make it to the services but a picture (GrandpaTroutSmall.jpg) of me with the only fish I was able to fool on that cold afternoon did.
The rod is now being restored. I hope I get it back in time for the green drake hatch on the Metolius!
Please help focus the development in this beautiful part of the world. We all know it will come but let’s use some common sense.
Sincerely yours,
Patrick Buresh
Bend, OR
I appreciate what you are trying to do here. Maybe my story can help.
I am partially responsible for the growth in Central Oregon. My wife and I moved here with our son almost 5 years ago. We have since added a daughter and will be picking up our adopted son at the Portland airport on Saturday, May 5. So, I understand the need for development. However, the Metolius Basin is not the appropriate place for this development. It was once considered for National Park status! I would rather see Camp Sherman relocated and the land donated to the Deschutes Basin Land Trust then see more building near the basin. It is more appropriate to quadruple the number of people in the city of Sisters than put those people in a couple new cities near the Metolius River.
Last spring I visited my Grandpa Vetz – my last living grandparent. He was a WWII vet who trained in Camp Abbot (near Sunriver) and loved to fish. His time at Camp Abbot was one of the few things he was able to talk about during that visit. At times he couldn’t remember who I was or how many times we had walked around his apartment. But, he could remember playing in the snow in Central Oregon. I was able to convince my Uncle Rod that Grandpa’s old bamboo fly rod should come home with me. The only place I considered for that rod’s first outing in more than 20 years was the Metolius River. I have attached a picture (MetBowSmall.jpg) of the first fish I caught with the rod – a beautiful wild Metolius rainbow.
Grandpa died in early February. I headed to the Metolius with his old bamboo fly rod the next day. I was not able to make it to the services but a picture (GrandpaTroutSmall.jpg) of me with the only fish I was able to fool on that cold afternoon did.
The rod is now being restored. I hope I get it back in time for the green drake hatch on the Metolius!
Please help focus the development in this beautiful part of the world. We all know it will come but let’s use some common sense.
Sincerely yours,
Patrick Buresh
Bend, OR
Grandpa's Bamboo Flyrod - Patrick Buresh, Bend
Hello Senator Walker,
I am disappointed in the current form of SB30. The people of Oregon and the United States deserve better.
I am partially responsible for the growth in Central Oregon. My wife and I moved here with our son almost 5 years ago. We have since added a daughter and will be picking up our adopted son at the Portland airport on Saturday, May 5. So, I understand the need for development. However, the Metolius Basin is not the appropriate place for this development. It was once considered for National Park status! I would rather see Camp Sherman relocated and the land donated to the Deschutes Basin Land Trust then see more building near the basin. It is more appropriate to quadruple the number of people in the city of Sisters than put those people in a couple new cities near the Metolius River.
Last spring I visited my Grandpa Vetz – my last living grandparent. He was a WWII vet who trained in Camp Abbot (near Sunriver) and loved to fish. His time at Camp Abbot was one of the few things he was able to talk about during that visit. At times he couldn’t remember who I was or how many times we had walked around his apartment. But, he could remember playing in the snow in Central Oregon. I was able to convince my Uncle Rod that Grandpa’s old bamboo fly rod should come home with me. The only place I considered for that rod’s first outing in more than 20 years was the Metolius River. I have attached a picture (MetBowSmall.jpg) of the first fish I caught with the rod – a beautiful wild Metolius rainbow.
Grandpa died in early February. I headed to the Metolius with his old bamboo fly rod the next day. I was not able to make it to the services but a picture (GrandpaTroutSmall.jpg) of me with the only fish I was able to fool on that cold afternoon did.
The rod is now being restored. I hope I get it back in time for the green drake hatch on the Metolius!
Please help focus the development in this beautiful part of the world. We all know it will come but let’s use some common sense.
Sincerely yours,
Patrick Buresh
Bend, OR
I am disappointed in the current form of SB30. The people of Oregon and the United States deserve better.
I am partially responsible for the growth in Central Oregon. My wife and I moved here with our son almost 5 years ago. We have since added a daughter and will be picking up our adopted son at the Portland airport on Saturday, May 5. So, I understand the need for development. However, the Metolius Basin is not the appropriate place for this development. It was once considered for National Park status! I would rather see Camp Sherman relocated and the land donated to the Deschutes Basin Land Trust then see more building near the basin. It is more appropriate to quadruple the number of people in the city of Sisters than put those people in a couple new cities near the Metolius River.
Last spring I visited my Grandpa Vetz – my last living grandparent. He was a WWII vet who trained in Camp Abbot (near Sunriver) and loved to fish. His time at Camp Abbot was one of the few things he was able to talk about during that visit. At times he couldn’t remember who I was or how many times we had walked around his apartment. But, he could remember playing in the snow in Central Oregon. I was able to convince my Uncle Rod that Grandpa’s old bamboo fly rod should come home with me. The only place I considered for that rod’s first outing in more than 20 years was the Metolius River. I have attached a picture (MetBowSmall.jpg) of the first fish I caught with the rod – a beautiful wild Metolius rainbow.
Grandpa died in early February. I headed to the Metolius with his old bamboo fly rod the next day. I was not able to make it to the services but a picture (GrandpaTroutSmall.jpg) of me with the only fish I was able to fool on that cold afternoon did.
The rod is now being restored. I hope I get it back in time for the green drake hatch on the Metolius!
Please help focus the development in this beautiful part of the world. We all know it will come but let’s use some common sense.
Sincerely yours,
Patrick Buresh
Bend, OR
Stop the Degredation - Patrick Buresh, Bend
Hello Representative Burley,I am strongly opposed to development of destination resorts in or within 3 miles of the Metolius River basin, and I strongly support a version of SB-30 that prohibits such development. Please support a version of SB-30 that will stop the degradation of this precious, unspoiled part of our state.
That is the letter a person on westfly.com suggested we send to our senators and representatives. If you would like to see some discussion of the issue, here are some links:
www.westfly.com
Some photos of the basin: here.
This is the personal part.
I am partially responsible for the growth in Central Oregon. My wife and I moved here with our son almost 5 years ago. We have since added a daughter and will be picking up our adopted son at the Portland airport on Saturday, May 5. So, I understand the need for development. However, the Metolius Basin is not the appropriate place for this development. It was once considered for National Park status! I would rather see Camp Sherman relocated and the land donated to the Deschutes Basin Land Trust then see more building near the basin. It is more appropriate to quadruple the number of people in the city of Sisters than put those people in a couple new cities near the Metolius River.
Last spring I visited my Grandpa Vetz – my last living grandparent. He was a WWII vet who trained in Camp Abbot (near Sunriver) and loved to fish. His time at Camp Abbot was one of the few things he was able to talk about during that visit. At times he couldn’t remember who I was or how many times we had walked around his apartment. But, he could remember playing in the snow in Central Oregon. I was able to convince my Uncle Rod that Grandpa’s old bamboo fly rod should come home with me. The only place I considered for that rod’s first outing in more than 20 years was the Metolius River. I have attached a picture (MetBowSmall.jpg) of the first fish I caught with the rod – a beautiful wild Metolius rainbow.
Grandpa died in early February. I headed to the Metolius with his old bamboo fly rod the next day. I was not able to make it to the services but a picture (GrandpaTroutSmall.jpg) of me with the only fish I was able to fool on that cold afternoon did.
The rod is now being restored. I hope I get it back in time for the green drake hatch on the Metolius!
Please help focus the development in this beautiful part of the world. We all know it will come but let’s use some common sense.
Sincerely yours,
Patrick Buresh
Bend, OR
Let's Talk Money - Becky Wood Hardesty
Dear Senator Walker,
[sent to all State Senators:]
I too am writing to express my shock and dismay at your dilution of SB30. Frankly, your constituents expect more fortitude and strength from their elected representatives. It is no secret of course that the amended version of SB30 under cuts the entire essence of the amendment and really does no good. Excuse my boldness and frankness but it is very much like cutting off someone's two legs and one arm and parading the last arm left as some great compromise of which one can be proud. This is no accomplishment whatsoever. Going from high density resort to very slightly less high density resort is laughable at best. While I am a huge supporter and proponent of conservation easements and have spoken on the subject at seminars and classes and have even granted a few of my own, they frankly are inconsequential in this case when we are talking about such a pristine wilderness area.
Now, Senator Walker, since a sincere motivation to protect the priceless value of nature seems to be lacking in this amended version of SB30 why let's talk about what you do seem concerned about and that is money $$$$$. Yes, let's talk money. Obviously the only reason to put a resort in this area is money. No one is pretending to promote any other value of course. Commissioners want money. Developers want money. I'm not sure why you support their quest for money but apparently you have some reason to promote this. So let's take a hard look at money. Do you know how much MONEY it costs to fight forest fires, wildfires, in that area? Have you considered the dramatically increased risk of forest fire that would accompany the construction and use of 3,500 (or 2,500) homes? Have you personally researched this as a responsible Senator who cares about taxpayer dollars? From my initial research, one source indicated that that the B and B fire in 2003 which blasted that whole area cost a staggering multi multi million dollar figure to control. The same source indicated an even more staggering cost to fight the 500,000 acre Biscuit Fire in Southern Oregon - well over 3 times the cost of the B and B fire. Please note I am refraining from citing specific numbers because I want to provide solid facts and intend to do so in the near future but have only skimmed the surface on my research. And, frankly it is your job not mine to undertake an economic analysis of the very certain risk of fire occurring in the area and its impact on taxpayer dollars and government spending to control such fires. I urge you to do this immediately.
And, by the way, have you researched where the money to fight the B and B fire came from? Where do those funds come from? I as a taxpayer do not want to subsidize commissioners and developers profits. Who pays for the cost of controlling these wildfires? Not the developers. Not the commissioners. The taxpayers do! Of course, it's an easy out isn't it for these developers and commissioners to not have to concern themselves with the high cost of fighting wildfires which their development very well could ignite. These profit driven parties walk away from economic devastation without bearing the cost of wildfires. Your taxpayer constituents end up shouldering the bill of wildfire destruction thereby subsidizing private development enterprises.
So let's talk tax dollars. Is it your position that if the tax dollars that are used to fight wildfires don't come from Oregon's state budget then you don't care? Well, guess what, your taxpayer constituents care because WE pay federal AND state taxes.
In sum, I shouldn't have to restate the obvious reason for protecting this scenic area - nature is priceless. It really is. And anyone who is compromising this pristine nature for the sake of money should frankly be ashamed. It is flat out shameful. Try explaining it to your grandchildren some day and see how much respect they have for your decision if you allow a resort to be built in this area.
That being said, if you are only willing to look at money as the one and only value which should be driving this thing, then look at money. Look at the hard core facts.
Rebecca Biddle Wood Hardesty
[sent to all State Senators:]
I too am writing to express my shock and dismay at your dilution of SB30. Frankly, your constituents expect more fortitude and strength from their elected representatives. It is no secret of course that the amended version of SB30 under cuts the entire essence of the amendment and really does no good. Excuse my boldness and frankness but it is very much like cutting off someone's two legs and one arm and parading the last arm left as some great compromise of which one can be proud. This is no accomplishment whatsoever. Going from high density resort to very slightly less high density resort is laughable at best. While I am a huge supporter and proponent of conservation easements and have spoken on the subject at seminars and classes and have even granted a few of my own, they frankly are inconsequential in this case when we are talking about such a pristine wilderness area.
Now, Senator Walker, since a sincere motivation to protect the priceless value of nature seems to be lacking in this amended version of SB30 why let's talk about what you do seem concerned about and that is money $$$$$. Yes, let's talk money. Obviously the only reason to put a resort in this area is money. No one is pretending to promote any other value of course. Commissioners want money. Developers want money. I'm not sure why you support their quest for money but apparently you have some reason to promote this. So let's take a hard look at money. Do you know how much MONEY it costs to fight forest fires, wildfires, in that area? Have you considered the dramatically increased risk of forest fire that would accompany the construction and use of 3,500 (or 2,500) homes? Have you personally researched this as a responsible Senator who cares about taxpayer dollars? From my initial research, one source indicated that that the B and B fire in 2003 which blasted that whole area cost a staggering multi multi million dollar figure to control. The same source indicated an even more staggering cost to fight the 500,000 acre Biscuit Fire in Southern Oregon - well over 3 times the cost of the B and B fire. Please note I am refraining from citing specific numbers because I want to provide solid facts and intend to do so in the near future but have only skimmed the surface on my research. And, frankly it is your job not mine to undertake an economic analysis of the very certain risk of fire occurring in the area and its impact on taxpayer dollars and government spending to control such fires. I urge you to do this immediately.
And, by the way, have you researched where the money to fight the B and B fire came from? Where do those funds come from? I as a taxpayer do not want to subsidize commissioners and developers profits. Who pays for the cost of controlling these wildfires? Not the developers. Not the commissioners. The taxpayers do! Of course, it's an easy out isn't it for these developers and commissioners to not have to concern themselves with the high cost of fighting wildfires which their development very well could ignite. These profit driven parties walk away from economic devastation without bearing the cost of wildfires. Your taxpayer constituents end up shouldering the bill of wildfire destruction thereby subsidizing private development enterprises.
So let's talk tax dollars. Is it your position that if the tax dollars that are used to fight wildfires don't come from Oregon's state budget then you don't care? Well, guess what, your taxpayer constituents care because WE pay federal AND state taxes.
In sum, I shouldn't have to restate the obvious reason for protecting this scenic area - nature is priceless. It really is. And anyone who is compromising this pristine nature for the sake of money should frankly be ashamed. It is flat out shameful. Try explaining it to your grandchildren some day and see how much respect they have for your decision if you allow a resort to be built in this area.
That being said, if you are only willing to look at money as the one and only value which should be driving this thing, then look at money. Look at the hard core facts.
Rebecca Biddle Wood Hardesty
Keeping Oregon Oregon - James Olmstead, Eugene
[Sent to all State Senators:]
It has come to my attention that a mega-resort is planned to be built near the Metolius River. As you either know, or should know, the entire Metolius River and environs are among the crown jewels of Oregon's pristine resources. They are what make Oregon Oregon. To allow local and state government to pimp away this beautiful area by selling out to big developers is absolutely outrageous, morally and politically derelict and the mother of all bad judgments.
Please do your job. Represent the people. Protect the natural environments that have been placed in your trust. STOP DEVELOPMENT ON OR NEAR THE METOLIUS.
Best Regards,
Jim Olmsted

James L. Olmsted, Esq.*
Conservation & Preservation Counsel, L.L.C.
Eugene, OR
It has come to my attention that a mega-resort is planned to be built near the Metolius River. As you either know, or should know, the entire Metolius River and environs are among the crown jewels of Oregon's pristine resources. They are what make Oregon Oregon. To allow local and state government to pimp away this beautiful area by selling out to big developers is absolutely outrageous, morally and politically derelict and the mother of all bad judgments.
Please do your job. Represent the people. Protect the natural environments that have been placed in your trust. STOP DEVELOPMENT ON OR NEAR THE METOLIUS.
Best Regards,
Jim Olmsted

James L. Olmsted, Esq.*
Conservation & Preservation Counsel, L.L.C.
Eugene, OR
Calling Mike Carrier - Carolyn and Tom Wenrich, Lake Oswego
[Sent to the office of the Natural Resources Policy Director:]
We urge you to use your influence as Natural Resources Policy Director to support
the removal of the amendments added to SB 30, the bill to protect the fragile and unique Metolius River area from further resort development. The original bill was written to keep this World-reknowned natural resource as pristine as possible. The amendments have removed those protections. We appreicate your attention to this urgent matter. Oregon must maintain its dedication to preserving the beauty that it has.
Thank you,
Carolyn and Tom Wenrich
Lake Oswego, OR
We urge you to use your influence as Natural Resources Policy Director to support
the removal of the amendments added to SB 30, the bill to protect the fragile and unique Metolius River area from further resort development. The original bill was written to keep this World-reknowned natural resource as pristine as possible. The amendments have removed those protections. We appreicate your attention to this urgent matter. Oregon must maintain its dedication to preserving the beauty that it has.
Thank you,
Carolyn and Tom Wenrich
Lake Oswego, OR
Don't Sell Away Priceless Heritage - Mary (and Sage) Wood, Eugene
Dear Senator Walker:
[Sent to all Senators]
I am writing to express my profound disappointment at your committee's action in amending SB 30 to allow the destination resorts to be sited in the Metolius Basin. My 9 year old son and I made the long trip from Eugene believing that the committee would listen to citizen testimony and stand firm to protect one of this state's greatest natural treasures. The room was packed with citizens who appealed to you and the other committee members to carry out your duty to save this natural heritage for future generations. We are sorely disappointed that you and the other Senators, apart from Senator Westlund, allowed this amended version of SB 30 to go forward. It offers only illusory procedural steps. We stand firm in our belief that a COMPLETE BAN on destination resorts in the Metolius Basin is the only way to protect this area. I request that you take all action possible to protect the Metolius. It would be a travesty to allow this kind of development to ruin a place that Oregonians across the entire state hold dear. Legislators who fail to protect the Metolius Basin will be long remembered as the public officers who sold away our state's priceless heritage.
Mary (and Sage) Fox
Eugene, OR
[Sent to all Senators]
I am writing to express my profound disappointment at your committee's action in amending SB 30 to allow the destination resorts to be sited in the Metolius Basin. My 9 year old son and I made the long trip from Eugene believing that the committee would listen to citizen testimony and stand firm to protect one of this state's greatest natural treasures. The room was packed with citizens who appealed to you and the other committee members to carry out your duty to save this natural heritage for future generations. We are sorely disappointed that you and the other Senators, apart from Senator Westlund, allowed this amended version of SB 30 to go forward. It offers only illusory procedural steps. We stand firm in our belief that a COMPLETE BAN on destination resorts in the Metolius Basin is the only way to protect this area. I request that you take all action possible to protect the Metolius. It would be a travesty to allow this kind of development to ruin a place that Oregonians across the entire state hold dear. Legislators who fail to protect the Metolius Basin will be long remembered as the public officers who sold away our state's priceless heritage.
Mary (and Sage) Fox
Eugene, OR
Tuesday, May 1, 2007
Support the Original SB 30 - Liz Rink, Bend
Hello Senator Westlund:
[Sent to all State Senators]
Thank you for your dedication on SB30. I want to encourage the entire Senate to support the ORIGINAL SB30 not the new version. Now is the critical moment to preserve an exquisite unspoiled area of our state. The Metolius River is in danger of pollution, over use, and restriction. After living in Central Oregon for 30 years we have seen some very special places built up, trees torn down, restrictions=ruined. Please ask that the resorts be BANNED in and within a three mile radius of the Metolius River Basin. The amendments have weakened the bill that needs to be strong and clear.
Liz Rink
Bend, OR
[Sent to all State Senators]
Thank you for your dedication on SB30. I want to encourage the entire Senate to support the ORIGINAL SB30 not the new version. Now is the critical moment to preserve an exquisite unspoiled area of our state. The Metolius River is in danger of pollution, over use, and restriction. After living in Central Oregon for 30 years we have seen some very special places built up, trees torn down, restrictions=ruined. Please ask that the resorts be BANNED in and within a three mile radius of the Metolius River Basin. The amendments have weakened the bill that needs to be strong and clear.
Liz Rink
Bend, OR
Do Not Fail The Metolius - Paul Mitchell, Portland
dear oregon state senators,
i am writing you all today because i do not want developers who care more about money than the environment to build driveways, sidewalks, homes and lights in the metolius basin.
i am a fourth generation oregonian on both sides of my family. though i have only been to the headwaters of the metolius four times in my entire life, i plan on returning with my grandkids for what i hope will be for them what it was for me, nothing short of an amazing three-day camping trip with my own parents and grand parents.
there are plenty of places to build in central oregon. but there is only one metolius, a river as unique as it is wild and pure.
don't destroy it with rich peoples' homes, rich people who otherwise would never get off their fat butts and walk to the headwaters, rich people who want it for themselves all year round, who never camped a day in their lives.
only a moral coward who is on the take would allow this to happen. tell them to go soemwhere else.
i hold each and everyone of you responisbile for the state of the state. if this development happens, i will personally go door to door and work many hours to vote you out of the office you are apparently using for your own gain.
love over gold my senators, love over gold.
i wish you well in your fight for our land and her wild beauty. do not fail the metolius, do not fail this basin. do not do what bush would do.
i care about the environment. do you? or do you just say you do?
thank you very much for your time.
sincerely,
paul mitchell
multnomah county
registered republican
portland oregon
i am writing you all today because i do not want developers who care more about money than the environment to build driveways, sidewalks, homes and lights in the metolius basin.
i am a fourth generation oregonian on both sides of my family. though i have only been to the headwaters of the metolius four times in my entire life, i plan on returning with my grandkids for what i hope will be for them what it was for me, nothing short of an amazing three-day camping trip with my own parents and grand parents.
there are plenty of places to build in central oregon. but there is only one metolius, a river as unique as it is wild and pure.
don't destroy it with rich peoples' homes, rich people who otherwise would never get off their fat butts and walk to the headwaters, rich people who want it for themselves all year round, who never camped a day in their lives.
only a moral coward who is on the take would allow this to happen. tell them to go soemwhere else.
i hold each and everyone of you responisbile for the state of the state. if this development happens, i will personally go door to door and work many hours to vote you out of the office you are apparently using for your own gain.
love over gold my senators, love over gold.
i wish you well in your fight for our land and her wild beauty. do not fail the metolius, do not fail this basin. do not do what bush would do.
i care about the environment. do you? or do you just say you do?
thank you very much for your time.
sincerely,
paul mitchell
multnomah county
registered republican
portland oregon
Enact The Will Of The People - Ervin Siverson, Portland
Dear Senator Carter:
[Sent to all State Senators]
I am writing to express my utter dismay at the outcome of the supposed public hearings concerning Senate Bill 30 limiting development of destination resorts in the Metolius River Basin. C. S. Lewis, in his book Mere Christianity wrote "that a complacent acceptance of the status quo reflects more than a failure of nerve." This statement expresses exactly what happened; a failure to act in a manner that reflect what the people wanted; an acceptance of the status quo. The developers, with their lobbyists and high price attorneys dominated the first public hearing not allowing the public to speak. And at the second public hearing, it was clear that the decision to amend Senate Bill 30 was done before the public had a chance to speak, thus making a mockery of the whole legislative process. Why invite the public to speak when you don't listen to them? Both Senators Ben Westlund and Vickie Walker produced a several inches thick folder showing the letters in support of SB 30, and a slim folder against (Senator Westlund said five letters) yet the bill was amended effectively gutting the original intent of Senate Bill 30, thus ignoring the will of the people. Is this not the the true nature of why you are elected, to enact the will of the people? So the developers, with the ability to hire lobbyists full-time to work deals out of the public eye are given the priority over the will of the people? And government wonders why the citizens are frustrated with the legislative process and its elected officials? And the best they can do (the legislators) is accuse us of "NIMBYism?" I write to express my full support of Senate Bill 30 IN ITS ORIGINAL FORM and welcome any response to my letter.
Ervin Siverson
Portland, OR
[Sent to all State Senators]
I am writing to express my utter dismay at the outcome of the supposed public hearings concerning Senate Bill 30 limiting development of destination resorts in the Metolius River Basin. C. S. Lewis, in his book Mere Christianity wrote "that a complacent acceptance of the status quo reflects more than a failure of nerve." This statement expresses exactly what happened; a failure to act in a manner that reflect what the people wanted; an acceptance of the status quo. The developers, with their lobbyists and high price attorneys dominated the first public hearing not allowing the public to speak. And at the second public hearing, it was clear that the decision to amend Senate Bill 30 was done before the public had a chance to speak, thus making a mockery of the whole legislative process. Why invite the public to speak when you don't listen to them? Both Senators Ben Westlund and Vickie Walker produced a several inches thick folder showing the letters in support of SB 30, and a slim folder against (Senator Westlund said five letters) yet the bill was amended effectively gutting the original intent of Senate Bill 30, thus ignoring the will of the people. Is this not the the true nature of why you are elected, to enact the will of the people? So the developers, with the ability to hire lobbyists full-time to work deals out of the public eye are given the priority over the will of the people? And government wonders why the citizens are frustrated with the legislative process and its elected officials? And the best they can do (the legislators) is accuse us of "NIMBYism?" I write to express my full support of Senate Bill 30 IN ITS ORIGINAL FORM and welcome any response to my letter.
Ervin Siverson
Portland, OR
Monday, April 30, 2007
In Your Hearts You Know What Is Right - Bill Failing, Portland
[Sent to Senators Kate Brown, Ginny Burdick, Rick Metsger, Vicki Walker, Rod Monroe, Peter Courtney, Betsy Johnson:]
Dear Senators (Chosen for this mail because you would be among the last to sell this down the river, so to speak)---
It is hard to believe that this plea even needs to be sent. Have we, Oregonians all, lost it completely? To allow development into one of Oregon’s most uniqually natural landscapes, at the top of everybody’s list of Oregon’s most scenic spots, part of Beautiful Oregon lore past and present, fall to developers?
The developers are winning this one…but you can still stop them. Please support a complete ban on SB 30, not the vaguely-worded “compromise” that offers nothing.
The amendments that weakened SB 30 can and must be removed.
My wife Michele Bowler has worked with some of you---suggesting that you be contacted directly. Others of you may know John Russell who is a developer (and Camp Sherman summer resident) who does great projects---and where they are appropriate---without scorching the earth. Follow his lead---because in your hearts you know what is right and wrong with this irreversible desecration. This wilderness does not need a golf course!
My family has been coming to this area since the 1920’s. I have photographs taken by them of this area that are instantly recognizable today. Let’s make this area recognizable 100 years from now. Please use your considerable influence to stop this notion that development will somehow improve this area, and be the elixir to fix Jefferson County’s impoverished treasury. There are no trade-offs if the Metolius is compromised!
Thanks in advance for doing what is right.
Godspeed!
Bill Failing
Portland, OR
Dear Senators (Chosen for this mail because you would be among the last to sell this down the river, so to speak)---
It is hard to believe that this plea even needs to be sent. Have we, Oregonians all, lost it completely? To allow development into one of Oregon’s most uniqually natural landscapes, at the top of everybody’s list of Oregon’s most scenic spots, part of Beautiful Oregon lore past and present, fall to developers?
The developers are winning this one…but you can still stop them. Please support a complete ban on SB 30, not the vaguely-worded “compromise” that offers nothing.
The amendments that weakened SB 30 can and must be removed.
My wife Michele Bowler has worked with some of you---suggesting that you be contacted directly. Others of you may know John Russell who is a developer (and Camp Sherman summer resident) who does great projects---and where they are appropriate---without scorching the earth. Follow his lead---because in your hearts you know what is right and wrong with this irreversible desecration. This wilderness does not need a golf course!
My family has been coming to this area since the 1920’s. I have photographs taken by them of this area that are instantly recognizable today. Let’s make this area recognizable 100 years from now. Please use your considerable influence to stop this notion that development will somehow improve this area, and be the elixir to fix Jefferson County’s impoverished treasury. There are no trade-offs if the Metolius is compromised!
Thanks in advance for doing what is right.
Godspeed!
Bill Failing
Portland, OR
Pure and Clear - Betsy Warriner, Bend
Dear Senator Westlund:
[copied to all State Senators]
Please keep up your strong support for the original Senate Bill 30,
without diluting amendments. The Metolius water rises up from the
ground pure and clear, creating the most beautiful colors in water that
I have ever seen. We need to do everything we can to preserve that
clarity. Please keep all resorts from within three miles of the
Metolius Basin.
Now is the time to act to protect this unique heritage for us and
generations to come.
Thank you, Betsy Warriner
Bend, OR
[copied to all State Senators]
Please keep up your strong support for the original Senate Bill 30,
without diluting amendments. The Metolius water rises up from the
ground pure and clear, creating the most beautiful colors in water that
I have ever seen. We need to do everything we can to preserve that
clarity. Please keep all resorts from within three miles of the
Metolius Basin.
Now is the time to act to protect this unique heritage for us and
generations to come.
Thank you, Betsy Warriner
Bend, OR
Complete Opposition To Resorts In The Basin - J.D. Williamson, Bend
Dear Senator Westlund,
[copied to all senators]
I am a fishery biologist from Bend. Please understand my complete opposition to any destiantion resorts in the Metolius Basin--the subject of SB 30. This basin is a treasure for the state and the nation and needs to be treated as such. With the state's only thriving bull trout population, the area deserves our highest level of protection. Please support the original version of SB 30.
Thank you,
J.D. Williamson
Bend, OR
[copied to all senators]
I am a fishery biologist from Bend. Please understand my complete opposition to any destiantion resorts in the Metolius Basin--the subject of SB 30. This basin is a treasure for the state and the nation and needs to be treated as such. With the state's only thriving bull trout population, the area deserves our highest level of protection. Please support the original version of SB 30.
Thank you,
J.D. Williamson
Bend, OR
Begging For Due Diligence - Kathy Krause, Portland
Respectfully Senator(s):
I have written to all of you recently URGING you to support Senate Bill 30. I now IMPLORE you to support Senate Bill 30 in its ORIGINAL form - banning destination resorts within a three mile buffer of the Metolius River Basin.
I have lived in Oregon for the last thirty two years. I pay taxes, I vote, and I live my life responsibly and accountably. I have chosen to live in Oregon because the legislators of the past have protected and preserved the countless sacred and beautiful scenic areas this State possesses for all Oregonians to enjoy. This State is unique and unlike any other in our country. I depend on all of you, our elected officials to keep it that way!
I support growth, enjoy resorts and golf. HOWEVER, careful thought needs to be made on where these resorts are built. Three miles within a privately and Federally protected wild and scenic river is not one of them! There are many reasons this issue should be heard and settled by the State legislature:
* Who will pay for the evacuation and protection of a resort community if a wildfire breaks loose in this tinderbox of a vast forested area? During the B&B fire and even last year, State and out of State resources were used and stretched thin just to protect the very small communities that reside in this area currently. Water, machinery and manpower are limited now - what happens when there is a population increase of thousands? Extreme pressure was put on neighboring county's roads and resources and this was a natural disaster in a small community. During the B&B fire is took hours to evacuate the current population of a mere 200 Camp Sherman residents. Estimates for the planned resort(s) is up to or more than 3000 residents.
* Where will the water come from to support such a community and its golf courses? The source of the Metolius River water supply has been studied and is still unknown. Any depletion of the surrounding water table could have disastrous impact on the river flow, endangering Federally protected fish species, birds and other wildlife.
* Who will clean up the runoff in the Metolius aquifer from septic, fertilizer and other water containments that would result from this proposed population increase? By the time water damage from the proposed resorts is identified, it will be too late! Clean up will not be an option! Will we then ask why no one thought about this earlier?
* Where will the funds come from to repair/replace the roads that are heavily traveled by construction crews and vehicles during the building phase and then used by a population increase of thousands of residents and employees? By the way, this will be a resort. A majority of the owners and visitors of these resorts will be from out of State. As a taxpaying Oregonian, shouldn't my voice on these concerns be heard first? Much like I believe in preventative healthcare, I believe in preventative management of land use. It is important to think of the ramifications of decisions prior to making them.
* What about all the countless Federal, State, local and private funds that have already been spent protecting this river and its wildlife? Was this money wasted?
* The land in question was originally purchased as a timber harvesting agreement and could not be subdivided. Due to Jefferson County's change of heart, not only will the companies in question reap the benefits of the timber harvest (to the tune of 10,000,000 + dollars) they will also benefit from a starting price tag of $500,000 per lot. I do not feel the voting taxpayers of Oregon should have to pay the bill for the destruction and damage incurred by having resort properties built within a three mile area of the Metolius River Basin. This area is clearly unable support the infrastructure.
I beg you to do due diligence in educating yourselves on this very important issue. An issue which will financially impact all Oregonians, impact our States cherished and loved landscapes and wildlife inhabitants and potentially harm and destroy one of the last and finest examples of a natural wild and scenic river area. The Metolius River Basin is a gift to all Oregonians, and demands protection! Senate Bill 30 in its original form, (without amendments) prohibiting destination resort development within three miles of the Metolius River Basin will provide this protection. This State has plenty of landing pads for destination resorts. Within three miles of the Metolius River Basin is not one of them!
Thank you for taking the time to listen to me. I welcome any comments and answers to my above questions.
Sincerely,
Kathy Krause
Multnomah County
Portland, Oregon
I have written to all of you recently URGING you to support Senate Bill 30. I now IMPLORE you to support Senate Bill 30 in its ORIGINAL form - banning destination resorts within a three mile buffer of the Metolius River Basin.
I have lived in Oregon for the last thirty two years. I pay taxes, I vote, and I live my life responsibly and accountably. I have chosen to live in Oregon because the legislators of the past have protected and preserved the countless sacred and beautiful scenic areas this State possesses for all Oregonians to enjoy. This State is unique and unlike any other in our country. I depend on all of you, our elected officials to keep it that way!
I support growth, enjoy resorts and golf. HOWEVER, careful thought needs to be made on where these resorts are built. Three miles within a privately and Federally protected wild and scenic river is not one of them! There are many reasons this issue should be heard and settled by the State legislature:
* Who will pay for the evacuation and protection of a resort community if a wildfire breaks loose in this tinderbox of a vast forested area? During the B&B fire and even last year, State and out of State resources were used and stretched thin just to protect the very small communities that reside in this area currently. Water, machinery and manpower are limited now - what happens when there is a population increase of thousands? Extreme pressure was put on neighboring county's roads and resources and this was a natural disaster in a small community. During the B&B fire is took hours to evacuate the current population of a mere 200 Camp Sherman residents. Estimates for the planned resort(s) is up to or more than 3000 residents.
* Where will the water come from to support such a community and its golf courses? The source of the Metolius River water supply has been studied and is still unknown. Any depletion of the surrounding water table could have disastrous impact on the river flow, endangering Federally protected fish species, birds and other wildlife.
* Who will clean up the runoff in the Metolius aquifer from septic, fertilizer and other water containments that would result from this proposed population increase? By the time water damage from the proposed resorts is identified, it will be too late! Clean up will not be an option! Will we then ask why no one thought about this earlier?
* Where will the funds come from to repair/replace the roads that are heavily traveled by construction crews and vehicles during the building phase and then used by a population increase of thousands of residents and employees? By the way, this will be a resort. A majority of the owners and visitors of these resorts will be from out of State. As a taxpaying Oregonian, shouldn't my voice on these concerns be heard first? Much like I believe in preventative healthcare, I believe in preventative management of land use. It is important to think of the ramifications of decisions prior to making them.
* What about all the countless Federal, State, local and private funds that have already been spent protecting this river and its wildlife? Was this money wasted?
* The land in question was originally purchased as a timber harvesting agreement and could not be subdivided. Due to Jefferson County's change of heart, not only will the companies in question reap the benefits of the timber harvest (to the tune of 10,000,000 + dollars) they will also benefit from a starting price tag of $500,000 per lot. I do not feel the voting taxpayers of Oregon should have to pay the bill for the destruction and damage incurred by having resort properties built within a three mile area of the Metolius River Basin. This area is clearly unable support the infrastructure.
I beg you to do due diligence in educating yourselves on this very important issue. An issue which will financially impact all Oregonians, impact our States cherished and loved landscapes and wildlife inhabitants and potentially harm and destroy one of the last and finest examples of a natural wild and scenic river area. The Metolius River Basin is a gift to all Oregonians, and demands protection! Senate Bill 30 in its original form, (without amendments) prohibiting destination resort development within three miles of the Metolius River Basin will provide this protection. This State has plenty of landing pads for destination resorts. Within three miles of the Metolius River Basin is not one of them!
Thank you for taking the time to listen to me. I welcome any comments and answers to my above questions.
Sincerely,
Kathy Krause
Multnomah County
Portland, Oregon
Shocked And Appalled - Randall Jones, Bend
Dear Senator Westlund:
I am a project manager for Brooks Resources Corporation here in Central Oregon. I am writing in personal support of the original version of SB 30. My views do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.
However, as a Land Developer myself, and, as importantly, as a lifelong Oregonian and one who's professional career has included environmental consulting all over the Pacific Northwest, I am more than shocked over the proposal to develop a large destination resort in the Metolius River Basin -- I am appalled. The proported idea that such a proposal could be "environmentally friendly" is an oxymoron in the Metolius River Basin.
First, the thick volcanic soils in the basin transmit runoff and pollutants as quickly than any soil medium in the State...the fate of such water and contaminants is the Metolius River itself. This river resource is precious and unique. There literally is nothing like it in the entire State or the Northwest. It is a precious and unique PUBLIC resource. No amount of legislation, development design, or collection of conditions of approval can ever negate the certain and negative water quality effects such a proposal will incur. Moreover, no private-land-rights argument will prevent such impact.
As an unreplaceable PUBLIC resource, I do demand that my elected State Representatives take a strong hand in passing the original version of Senate Bill 30. While such an action may step on the County's toes, in an era of a multitude of attempts to reasonably provide opportunities for housing, jobs, and management of growth, Jefferson County needs to step away from such an offhanded proposal in such a sensitive locale. They should know better, because once approved, the County will have no better capacity than anyone else to prevent significant environmental impact to this State Water -- the Metolius River.
Indeed growth must be well managed in Oregon. The bulk of my professional career has been focused on answering those issues. My efforts have resulted in national community design awards, demonstrated environmental restoration that occurred along with development, and the development of many community master plans that have allowed cities and counties in Oregon grow well, expand their tax base, and foster development that minimized environmental impact. These projects were also profitable for the private sector. The proponents of the development in the Metolius Basin and the opponents of SB 30 can also be strong voices in the arena of growth management. Such answers need not come at such a monumental probable cost to this State, our citizens, or me as a caring responsible taxpayer.
Thank you for receiving my strong support of the original version of SB 30.
Randall A. Jones
Bend, OR
I am a project manager for Brooks Resources Corporation here in Central Oregon. I am writing in personal support of the original version of SB 30. My views do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.
However, as a Land Developer myself, and, as importantly, as a lifelong Oregonian and one who's professional career has included environmental consulting all over the Pacific Northwest, I am more than shocked over the proposal to develop a large destination resort in the Metolius River Basin -- I am appalled. The proported idea that such a proposal could be "environmentally friendly" is an oxymoron in the Metolius River Basin.
First, the thick volcanic soils in the basin transmit runoff and pollutants as quickly than any soil medium in the State...the fate of such water and contaminants is the Metolius River itself. This river resource is precious and unique. There literally is nothing like it in the entire State or the Northwest. It is a precious and unique PUBLIC resource. No amount of legislation, development design, or collection of conditions of approval can ever negate the certain and negative water quality effects such a proposal will incur. Moreover, no private-land-rights argument will prevent such impact.
As an unreplaceable PUBLIC resource, I do demand that my elected State Representatives take a strong hand in passing the original version of Senate Bill 30. While such an action may step on the County's toes, in an era of a multitude of attempts to reasonably provide opportunities for housing, jobs, and management of growth, Jefferson County needs to step away from such an offhanded proposal in such a sensitive locale. They should know better, because once approved, the County will have no better capacity than anyone else to prevent significant environmental impact to this State Water -- the Metolius River.
Indeed growth must be well managed in Oregon. The bulk of my professional career has been focused on answering those issues. My efforts have resulted in national community design awards, demonstrated environmental restoration that occurred along with development, and the development of many community master plans that have allowed cities and counties in Oregon grow well, expand their tax base, and foster development that minimized environmental impact. These projects were also profitable for the private sector. The proponents of the development in the Metolius Basin and the opponents of SB 30 can also be strong voices in the arena of growth management. Such answers need not come at such a monumental probable cost to this State, our citizens, or me as a caring responsible taxpayer.
Thank you for receiving my strong support of the original version of SB 30.
Randall A. Jones
Bend, OR
What On Earth Is Happening to Oregon? - Carol Routh, Portland
What on earth is happening to Oregon?
We can't update the Bottle Bill to include ALL beverage containers???
We can't update the deposit to 10 cents???
What has happened to our spine?
We're afraid to tax tobacco???
We'll sacrifice medical services for kids because Big Tobacco objects???
What has happened to our spine?
We're afraid to charge a reasonable amount for vehicle registration???
We're not able to maintain our roads and bridges for lack of funds???
What has happened to our spine?
We're willing to give away our most precious pieces of natural
sanctuary to developers???
We're willing to give up the Metolius Basin???!!!
What has happened to our spine?
We're willing to give up our farmland, our land use planning, our
signature foresight that has made us world renowned???
We got sold a bill of goods by developers and think that now we're
stuck with it?
Where's the spine to reverse a devastating decision made on bad
information and a gutwrenching (but very slick) media campaign?
At the beginning of this legislative session there was hope that
finally, FINALLY! things would turn around and we'd see some progress
on the things that matter so much to Oregonians. Why has it all
seemed to stall out?
And one last thing -- WHAT were they thinking in the Senate when they
passed the Pedestrian Hand-wave law??? Talk about inviting chaos and
crashes, this one has to top them all. Please don't let that one go
into law.
Please pull out all the stops and get this legislature to do what's
right by Oregon, now, in this session. SB 30 and Measure 37 are
disasters that can't be reversed later. Please make us proud and
grateful to be Oregonians again.
Thanks,
Carol Routh
Portland OR
We can't update the Bottle Bill to include ALL beverage containers???
We can't update the deposit to 10 cents???
What has happened to our spine?
We're afraid to tax tobacco???
We'll sacrifice medical services for kids because Big Tobacco objects???
What has happened to our spine?
We're afraid to charge a reasonable amount for vehicle registration???
We're not able to maintain our roads and bridges for lack of funds???
What has happened to our spine?
We're willing to give away our most precious pieces of natural
sanctuary to developers???
We're willing to give up the Metolius Basin???!!!
What has happened to our spine?
We're willing to give up our farmland, our land use planning, our
signature foresight that has made us world renowned???
We got sold a bill of goods by developers and think that now we're
stuck with it?
Where's the spine to reverse a devastating decision made on bad
information and a gutwrenching (but very slick) media campaign?
At the beginning of this legislative session there was hope that
finally, FINALLY! things would turn around and we'd see some progress
on the things that matter so much to Oregonians. Why has it all
seemed to stall out?
And one last thing -- WHAT were they thinking in the Senate when they
passed the Pedestrian Hand-wave law??? Talk about inviting chaos and
crashes, this one has to top them all. Please don't let that one go
into law.
Please pull out all the stops and get this legislature to do what's
right by Oregon, now, in this session. SB 30 and Measure 37 are
disasters that can't be reversed later. Please make us proud and
grateful to be Oregonians again.
Thanks,
Carol Routh
Portland OR
Discouraged By Amendments - Michael Funke, Bend
[Sent to Senator Vicki Walker:]
I am very discouraged to hear that you amended SB 30 late Friday night.
I would like to know why you introduced this amendment and how you think the new, amended SB 30 will protect the Metolius Basin.
Since I live over here in Central Oregon I probably hear more frequently than you do from people who regularly visit the Metolius and are very concerned about what destination resorts will do to this beautiful part of our region. Their concerns are evident in the huge amount of correspondence in support of the original, unamended SB 30.
We have seen how the proliferation of destination resorts have permanently altered the landscape of Powell Butte and other parts of Central Oregon. They also have had a profound impact on our regional economy as they increase the number and percentage of jobs that traditionally pay low wages.
I really do want to know the rationale for amending SB 30 they way you did. I look forward to your response.
Michael Funke
Bend, Oregon
I am very discouraged to hear that you amended SB 30 late Friday night.
I would like to know why you introduced this amendment and how you think the new, amended SB 30 will protect the Metolius Basin.
Since I live over here in Central Oregon I probably hear more frequently than you do from people who regularly visit the Metolius and are very concerned about what destination resorts will do to this beautiful part of our region. Their concerns are evident in the huge amount of correspondence in support of the original, unamended SB 30.
We have seen how the proliferation of destination resorts have permanently altered the landscape of Powell Butte and other parts of Central Oregon. They also have had a profound impact on our regional economy as they increase the number and percentage of jobs that traditionally pay low wages.
I really do want to know the rationale for amending SB 30 they way you did. I look forward to your response.
Michael Funke
Bend, Oregon
Support A Strong SB 30 - Mike McAvoy, Portland
Dear Senator Brown:
I am strongly opposed to development of destination resorts in or within 3 miles of the Metolius River basin, and I strongly support a version of SB-30 that prohibits such development. Please support a version of SB-30 that will stop the degradation of this precious, unspoiled part of our state.
Sincerely yours,
Michael McAvoy
Portland, OR
I am strongly opposed to development of destination resorts in or within 3 miles of the Metolius River basin, and I strongly support a version of SB-30 that prohibits such development. Please support a version of SB-30 that will stop the degradation of this precious, unspoiled part of our state.
Sincerely yours,
Michael McAvoy
Portland, OR
